Re: [base736] Insurance for BASE demo
Over 15 years ago we tried something like this. We thought demo jumps using BASE gear from 500-feet would be an exciting and novel air show act we could take on the road. The two things we had to get around were insurance and FAR 105, section 43.
Section 43 is the one that states the gear must be a dual container system with an approved harness, and an approved reserve. In this case "approved" means TSO'd.
We approached Section 43 by asking the FAA for a waiver. We believed we were on strong ground as waivers are granted to aerobatic pilots to perform their maneuvers right down to ground level if they can first prove they are competent to do so. We also showed them that using the type of gear mandated (basically a skydiving rig) would make these jumps more dangerous and not safer. I remember spending an hour with an inspector at the FISDO explaining the theory of the BASE single harness and container system. And I was excited when he agreed.
The problem became the insurance. Tagging onto the USPA demo insurance program didn’t work as they (the insurance company) follow the USPA basic safety recommendations. I spoke to Bill Ottly at USPA about a waiver to the equipment and altitude BSRs and although he said it was a cool idea, waivers wouldn't be granted. He was (and rightly I suppose) worried about doing anything to jeopardize the USPA's ability to get such demo insurance which has always been tenuous at best.
So, that's were we left it. We tried a few aviation insurance companies and while they were open to the idea it was the premiums born solely by us that wouldn't work.
Think of an Otter screaming down the center line at 500-feet (or even lower) and one by one five BASE jumpers exit at show center. The crowd would crap their pants!
Someday, maybe the ABP will be large enough and with enough "dues" paying members that this might work out . . .
NickD
BASE 194