Re: [fundgh] Canopy Size
In reply to:
In BASE, is Wing loading as much of a factor as it is in SD? I hear a lot about WL in skydiving forums, but never read anything about it in BASE forums.
You don’t hear wing loading addressed in BASE jumping much because the talk is more about aspect ratio.
We learned long ago boxy is better for a canopy in terms of openings. That’s why a canopy called a Strato Star is popular in BASE jumping for a while. They opened with the reliability of a round, as they had only five cells and those big overhung cells gulped in the sub terminal air like today’s vented canopies. You really had do something drastically wrong to get an off heading opening on one. The only problem with these canopies is you’d always take a pasting in the parking lot.
The final determination on wing loading is easily solved while standing on the roof of your local Flatiron Building at night. Looking down into the big gulp you see a lot of pointy tipped stuff staring right back at you. If the slightest thing goes wrong, your ability to come straight down, at a favorable decent rate, while still maintaining a full canopy over your head, is what’s gonna have you drinking a beer later.
In the early days we went too big sometimes, to the extreme that some very light people ended up swing stalling to impact. So you don’t hear much about wing loading in, let’s say a conversation about a BASE incident, no one asks because it’s a given it’s already in an acceptable range for BASE jumping.
Something else went wrong . . .
Nick
BASE 194
World BASE Fatality List
http://juliabell.home.att.net/