The double standard
It's kind of interesting the double standard people use to judge participants of high risk activities. If a football player is injured and then rehabilitated he may be able to play again. This return to the arena will be viewed by most as a heroic action. How brave to face your fears and continue on... No one will say, "See how dangerous that is?"
The same goes with a lot of sports. I personally feel that contact sports are very risky in terms of personal injury.
A hiker stumbles and breaks his leg. No one will tell him to stop hiking. He'll never hear someone say, "Wow, I bet you never do that again."
What is said to the skydiver who breaks a leg landing? "Look what happens when you risk your life on a regular basis?"
The skydiver's injury is identical to the football player and the hiker. The difference lies in the way the injury was sustained. Because we knew of the risk beforehand, do we deserve the outcome and should not be surprised when we're injured?
Maybe because we're acutely aware of the danger involved, we're at least able to look out for it and prepare for the eventuality that we'll someday be injured or worse. At least we KNOW danger is near. I see too many people who are risking a lot and don't even know it... not until the unthinkable happens.
Do you too see the double standard?