Basejumper.com - archive

General BASE

Shortcut
Slider-Up Heading Performance - Redux
I while back I posted some questions regarding slider-up heading performance with my Ace. Just wanted to fill people in on what I've learned since then.

After talking to people, trying a whole bunch of different ideas and watching Adam's & Vertigo's packing tapes a few times, I think I have the issues worked out... I've had 3 dead on slider-up openings in a row after narrowing things down.

In a nutshell, the problem appears to be mainly due to how I was closing my container (a Warlock from Vertigo) and partially how I was handling the nose.

With all the weirdness and head-scratching between me and my mentor, I decided to go back to the sources. So I studied Vertigo's and CR's packing tapes... Vertigo's to try and mimic how they were folding the canopy & closing the container, and CR's for how they were handling the nose, primarily.

On the container front, I was routing the pullup cord through the grommets and then just pulling everything together. No big deal on a skydiving rig, BAD juju on a BASE rig. After I became more disiplined about controlling the pack job and container flaps, my heading performance improved dramatically.

I also figured that since the Ace is Adam's canopy, maybe it wouldn't be such a bad idea to do the nose the way he did it. So I started wrapping the nose around the packjob (something which had given me the heebie-jeebies before).

So I'm pretty happy with everything now. Thanks to Adam for emailing me out of the blue and offering suggestions, as well as those of you I talked with offline.

Now if I can just find a pilot chute fold job that I like.... Wink
Shortcut
Re: [Zennie] Slider-Up Heading Performance - Redux
Are you using direct control on your slider?

I found that I got crisper (and hence, more on-heading) openings by leaving the direct control stow off my BJ (contrary to manufacturers instructions).
Shortcut
Re: [TomAiello] Slider-Up Heading Performance - Redux
Oh that was the other thing.... Adam recommended indirect control, which I am also doing.
Shortcut
Re: [Zennie] Slider-Up Heading Performance - Redux
I've got to the point where I use direct control only on terminal jumps (greater than 10 second delays). I'm sure that I have rambled on endlessly about this elsewhere, but in a nutshell direct control scares me as it keeps the canopy at line stretch but uninflated a bit longer - perfect time for an off-heading to develop.

I've always wrapped the nose around the packjob, both slider-up and slider-down. On a gut level, it makes sense to me - present the nose first, bidirectionally, to encourage initalization of nose-first inflation and decrease the chance of rotational off-heading at line stretch or just thereafter.

Peace,

D-d0g
Shortcut
Re: [TomAiello] Slider-Up Heading Performance - Redux
Hey, just out of curiosity what does it means by using direct control on the slider?

Cheers
Shortcut
Re: [skymick] Slider-Up Heading Performance - Redux
In reply to:
what does it means by using direct control on the slider?

Some time ago Tom wrote

"...Direct Control of the slider involves taking a bite of the slider mesh, and stowing it in a band attached to a line attachment point (usually a center C line). "

It's all at http://www.dropzone.com/...i?post=403969#403969 as part of a couple of interesting threads

Jules