Re: [Frodo] Jumping with 2 PCs?
In reply to:
Same principle as why you have two rather than one, and at the same time two, rather than 3 or 4, canopies in the rig ( I mean skydiving).
The principles that have guided skydivers to put two canopies into their rigs are largely irrelevant to the BASE environment.
A reserve canopy makes sense if
(a) you have altitude to use it--we don't.
(b) you pack the first one fast, and keep the careful pack job--we use the careful pack job on every jump.
(c) you have a potentially squirrely high performance canopy as a main--we don't.
Given the situation, the addition of a second canopy is, in my opinion, a needless complexity with very little return. The vast majority of BASE jumpers probably share this opinion, given the tiny market share afforded to the Sorcerer (the only two canopy BASE rig on the market).
In reply to:
Why a second pc would help? Because if one hesitates, the other, independent from the first, will most likely still inflate in time.
Imagine the possible problem scenarios, though. What if your PC's both orbit--in opposite directions? What if one is later than the other, and is still dancing around in the airspace the canopy inflates in--and wrapping it's bridle around your inflating pack job.
In reply to:
You can't afford pc hesitation jumping off a 200ft object can you?
Actually, I've experienced noticeable PC hesitation from below 200 feet. What I
really can't afford is a needlessly complex system at 200 feet.
I have a reputation for being too experimental with my gear. I have one friend who thinks that over-experimentation put me in the hospital at least once. This two PC's thing is such a bad idea that even I dismiss it after about thirty minutes of thinking about the possible problems. I really like seeing new jumpers thinking about the systems, and questioning the current gear--that's what makes it evolve and improve. But on this one, all I see happening is one of those "ebay jumper" fatalities.