Re: [base283] Site Naming
In reply to:
there was one intersting induvidual that bought a rig on ebay and jumped a wrong bridge, was in intensive care last I heard. take care, space..
We stopped at this "wrong" bridge over the weekend. A member of the PNW crew (who will go un-named to protect the guilty) has a hankerin' for repeating the jump.
Say what you will about the first jumper's judgment (and skills, and altitude estimating skills, and competence, and whatever else). . . man oh man he's got a heck of a lot of courage. Standing on that railing with a 42 inch PC in hand and jumping off. . . whoo-eee. Media reports pegged the span at 130+ feet; we lasered it at 98/99 feet on the button, at the highest point over dry land.
Somehow we resisted the urge to static line this particular B on the trip. A rare burst of good judgment emanating from the unseasonably-dry Pacific NW.
And, yes folks, Tom is right about not naming sites. Sometimes we get sloppy about this, figuring that "everyone knows about that obsure exit point down that long gravel road, past the ranger's house and a 10 mile hike from the trailhead." Surprisingly (to us, anyway) there ARE in fact folks in the world who have lives outside of BASE. . . and, for them, these sites we tend to live and breathe on a daily basis aren't so well-known a quantity. The less folks know about most BASE sites, the better - on many levels.
Lest folks think that this is a bunch of stuck-up BASE gods deciding to keep objects secret: there's nary a site in the world that a qualified jumper can't get beta for with a few phone calls to locals. BASE folks are the most generous people in the world, but we also need to protect not only our sites from unqualified jumpers, but also unqualified jumpers from our sites.
Peace and happy holidays!
D-dog
ddog@wrinko.com
www.wrinko.com