Re: [Toggle] Why Jumping Should Never Be Legal in Yosemite
Toggle wrote:
I just got home yesterday from a wonderful 8 day trip to the Valley. And then I read about whats happening in Chamonix. Ive seen the behavior and attitudes of many jumpers over the last several years and it sickens me. Its no surprise to see a temporary wingsuit ban while they sort things out. I'm sure this is only the beginning of the end for many of the great locations throughout Europe.
This brings me to the point of this thread.
Jumpers royally fucked up the opportunity for legal jumps a few decades ago in Yosemite. Could you imagine what today's generation would do? Make no mistake about it, they would shit all over the opportunity for legal jumps in Yosemite and would wreck it faster than your Mom's box on a Saturday night.
It is a shame, but it is reality. The "its all about me" attitude is supremely evident in BASE today and Ive largely seen it amongst a good majority of the wingsuit crowd. I do not support any movement for legal jumping in Yosemite and never will because I know what the outcome will be and the fallout will only make things harder for those of us that do enjoy our time there. I'd rather keep on carrying on with how things are now than deal with a shit show. If you're not convinced, just take a look whats been happening in Europe and I think you will agree.
Sorry, no. The NPS and USPA designed a system that could not succeed, and the NPS superintendent at the time is ON RECORD explaining how they had to create a destined-to-fail system so that "our management ban will stick" (Audubon Magazine, November 1980).
The NPS acted in bad faith, period. Jumpers did themselves no favors with
some of them practicing the "it's all about me" attitude, but even 100 percent perfect behavior would not have mattered because the fix was in.
That correction aside, I pretty much agree with you about legalizing jumping in Yosemite -- and that's a hard thing to say because I've been deeply involved since 1979 in trying to open the national parks to BASE.
Having said that, however, my efforts and those of the ABP were focused not so much on Yosemite but on other NPS units where jumping could be more easily integrated because the cliff access is much harder and often technical, and therefore filters out a lot of the yayhoos. The ABP always said "smaller, out-of-the-way units first, Yosemite
last" for the precise reasons you mention.
Finally, "today's generation" is not so much different than that first wave of city-geek skydivers who descended on Yosemite thinking it was a skydiving boogie venue, and it was in fact USPA executive director Bill Ottley and USPA itself that encouraged that conduct in its August 1980 Parachutist with a story headlined "El Capitan Opens for Skydiving," as if it was an effing amusement park.
Then it said "all" that was required was USPA membership, a D license, a hard helmet, and a square main (round reserves were still the standard then).
Notice what was missing?
How to act in a national park.
How to act in the backcountry.
So to circle back, yes, the jumpers did contribute to the "management ban" but even if they did everything right the NPS would have shut it down because it didn't want to be bothered, and it had an already-long history of shutting down adventure athletes (for example, they banned climbing from El Cap and on other big walls in the system for years for being "too dangerous").
Congratulations on your trip. I jumped there twice, once legally, once outlaw, and visited multiple other times. It is indeed a singular place that should not just be respected but revered.