Off heading openings and decisions of either rears or toggles?
G'day all, I did a search on here but nothing came up.
After seeing many off heading openings, 90's to 180's etc... What's the general "code of practise" to get out of these situations (Ie object strike etc...). From my skydiving practices and my mentors teachings, I've been going for rears and flying the openings with rears as (from my experiences) this keeps the whole canopy pressurised and can almost "reverse" the canopy to turn around with rears. But after reading comments here there and everywhere, toggles are suggested as the best thing to go for in these situations.?
My understanding of how a canopy works whilst flying is when you turn on rears, it keeps the canopy "fully" pressurised and does a shallower turn, loosing less altitude. When you do a toggle turn, especially a sharp one, it pushes the air out of the canopy so it has to "recover" before re pressurising back into full flight, in turn loosing more altitude and entering its natural recovery arc. I am sure a vented canopy would deal with these situations differently than a non vented skydiving canopy, so the reactions and behaviour of the canopy will differ in comparison. From skydiving, coming into land doing a hook turn on rears there seems to be no recovery arc as the wing in fully pressurised, when doing a toggle turn it needs to recover before going into full flight again for the flare. This is only from my experiences and it's probably wrong as fuck but I can only ask...
So the question is, what is the best practice for off heading openings, straight to toggles to (close to) stall point to try and reverse and turn away, or straight to rears risers to (close to) stall point to reverse and turn away?
What do you do in these situations?
Cheers