Re: [blitzkrieg] No PC?
blitzkrieg wrote:
I don't think you're being harsh, but not much to learn from it other than complacency kills, as you mentioned. I love Jimmy and I'm totally glad he made it work. However, it baffled me that this happened.
Honestly, the lesson here IMO is if you have two rigs, have two sets of everything to complete them as well, i.e. two pilot chutes. It's a silly thing to go without. I have at least three of each just in case. 😝
+ about 1,000 -- although what most baffles me about this one is how the co-owner of a major BASE gear manufacturer didn't have enough pilot chutes for two rigs...
The other thing is to literally have a written checklist. All aircraft pilots, whether they have 20 hours or 20,000 hours, in a Cessna or a 787, have a written checklist and follow it religiously because there are just too many critical paths to remember.
At least some and maybe all of the tandem manufacturers finally went to written checklists a few years ago so that now, part of TI pre-jump procedures is to read the checklist and call out each item as it's checked off. The reason? A tandem system is not as complex as a Cessna, but it's way more complex than a regular rig.
So maybe it's time to start thinking about written checklists for wingsuit jumps -- especially when jumping wingsuits in essentially a boogie environment, jumping new wingsuits, switching rigs and then switching pilot chutes too (and, of course, cameras!)... that is a heavy keep-track-of-everything workload for anybody -- and the fact it happened to someone of Jimmy's enormous parachuting experience and generally cautious and conservative approach reinforces the notion that it may now be time to start thinking about using written checklists.
And they don't need to be complicated, just a few critical-path checks such as:
Packed
PC
Pins
Routing
Harness
Suit
Camera(s)
Companions
Plan
Weather
Gut feeling
44