Re: [jeriko13] HTS / ZP Noses vs Standard
I can compare HTS with F111 and full ZP because I have 2 fullZP topskin Fox (no vents), one HTS Fox (one vent on central cell) and 2 F111 Fox (no vents) All with multi, old school style
I have very few slider down jumps compare to slider up jumps. slider down mostly with F111, and a couple with full ZP but none with HTS. So i will talk only about slider up jumps, terminal & sub-terminal.
I had no more heading problem with the full ZP or the HTS than the with the F111 ones. In fact, even less because when the F111 get old, your canopy start sniveling at opening. With the ZP, the fabric (nearly) never get old
The only (big) problem with the full ZP is the fast reaction when you pilot deep break / back risers. So i wouldn't recommend it on low jumps (i mean, near the object !) or for beginners. But an HTS doesn't react like full ZP, it's (in my opinion) more close to a F111 canopy for the "piloting part".
I haven't seen a big difference in performance (glide ratio) with the HTS (Full ZP really fly better !) but i now order my new canopys with HTS only because they last longer ... more jump before they start sniveling at opening. F111 is not so durable
So for what i know (slider up jumps) :
Full ZP : Fast /strong opening
really good glide ratio (for a 7 cells)
tricky to pilot deep break / back risers
Last forever (nearly !)
Heading OK
heavy ! bulky !
HTS : Nearly same opening than full F111, but for more jumps
Glide ratio ~ full F111, maybe a bit better
Less problem with deep break / back riser than FullZP but no as easy as the Full F111
a bit more heavy & bulky than F111 but not terrible
Full F111 Really good deep break piloting / landing.
good openings, but the F111 can worn out very fast sometimes ...
The conclusion is :
My favorite canopy is the HTS with one vent, for terminal & sub-terminal jumps, especialy for the sub-terminal ones !
For slider down, i prefer Full F111 but i'm not really into slider down jumps ...