Re: [78RATS] Long time lurker, first time caller.
78RATS wrote:
What is the reason for recommending unvented canopy (other than price)?
Price is the big one.
But there is a real argument to be made over bottom skin inlets that has been either forgotten over time or had over and over so many times that people are tired of arguing.
I don't have a lot of time today (I'm trying to catch up on paperwork and clean up before I start a course tomorrow), but the short version is:
Vented: Faster slider down pressurization, flying (hence can be flared to land) sooner during the sequence. Allows much better landings on very low jumps (because the wing is pressurized sooner). More likely to experience object strike (because the wing flying sooner gives the jumper less reaction time before it starts moving into the object). Post strike reinflation is usually fairly good (understanding that object strikes are very dynamic and unpredictable events), so the jumper is likely to be less seriously injured by an object strike.
Unvented: Slower slider down pressurization. Flying later, so rougher landings for low jumps. Less likely to experience object strike (because the wing gives more pause time before it begins to fly forward, giving the jumper more reaction time). Post strike reinflation is less predictable, so the jumper is more likely to be more seriously injured in the event of object strike.
There is also an argument over opening heading, and whether the bottom skin inlets help with that.
And then there's the argument about varying the number and size of inlets.
More in depth discussion is probably better done in person (with something to draw diagrams on), and would certainly take more time than I have right now.
It's a pretty complex topic, and I think we often have a tendency to want a simple answer (i.e. "vents are the best thing since sliced bread and everyone should always have as many as possible"), but unfortunately simple answers are usually too simple.