Re: [Treejumps] X goes in in Italy
Treejumps wrote:
This sport does not care who you are, or what you have done. You posted that 5 are dead in 6 days, all experienced, all in wingsuits. I haven't seen 1 show up on the BFL. Maybe if people knew about the first 5, they would think twice about that next rad proxy line. Restricting access to information is never going to help.
+1... very curious how the Sutton fatality went completely dark on this forum and the dropzone.com. Also curious how we are essentially returning to the wonderful old days of pre-ram-air wingsuits where 75 percent of those doing it DIED.
When one of the best goes in, it's always a reminder that the Reaper lurks for everyone.
When the best start going in
routinely, it's a warning that our practices, procedures and -- most importantly of all -- our
attitudes need adjustment.
Every year, more and more of our best terrain flyers are landing their wingsuits without first opening their parachutes.
What's the old saying? One is an anomaly. Two is a coincidence. Three is a trend.
To which I add: Four is a wakeup call. Five is a warning. Six is WTF are we all thinking?
There is also the "coincidence" that two of our finest went in while filming movies with a bunch of other guys. At what point does the boogie mentality eclipse common sense and caution?
At what point does the focus change from staying alive to getting a better shot?
During my many years in parachuting, I can count more than half a dozen fatalities that occurred during formal film shoots; the fatalities-per-jump comparison to "normal" jumping is exponentially higher.
When Jonathan Tagle went in on a canopy terrain flying jump, I wrote that we need to back off on intense jumps as the day goes on because everything we do slows down just a touch as we tire, and we don't notice the performance degradation because... we're tired. I wrote that we should therefore "fly on instruments" and back off a bit with each succeeding jump to cover the performance degradation that we cannot perceive.
IIRC Tagle was not on a photo shoot, but the same goes for photo shoots: Whether it's the first jump of the shoot or the last, back off a bit from what you think you know you can do because the photo shoot itself changes things the same way launching from an aircraft instead of a fixed point changes things.
And that also brings into play
quantum theory and the observed system. It is a fact of quantum physics that the act of observing a system changes the observed system.
Given this, it is imperative for people participating in photo shoots (and yes, I include all the informal shoots that mark essentially every wingsuit jump made these days) to understand that the "observations" made by the cameras are altering the way the jumps occur -- and when you're dealing with the very tight margins of today's "best" terrain flyers, those alterations can mean the difference between life and death.
Seriously, how many wingsuit terrain flights are even made today without a camera? They are, in quantum terms, all "observed systems" and all of that is changing the way we think about, approach and execute terrain flights.
Obviously, this is a general look at the overall situation and not specific to XXX because we have no details yet, but the bottom line is:
We are doing something wrong to be
routinely losing our best and we better stop, take a breath, and figure out what it is.
44