Re: [base570] Carl Boenish
base570 wrote:
robinheid wrote:
No it doesn't. It brings attention to this ongoing project that has gone on- and off-track numerous times since starting so long ago that I can't even remember what year it was that Marah filmed her interview with me for it.
Chris is fundamentally right that they need to
finish this - and not at some distant date down the road.
It's really effing simple, too: All your codependent enabling to the contrary, they have more than enough for "Carl Boenish I: The Early Years." Finish that, then do "CB II: Pioneer Days," and so on until they get it all done.
But they are flailing for a bunch of organizational and technical reasons I won't go into here, and having enablers such as yourself condone and support their flailing is far more undermining than 460's exhortation for them to get off their butts and get it done.
Intentions don't count.
Results count.
If the job's too big for them, then they need to bring more people into it, or hand off elements to someone else or, as I said, reconsider their presentation format and get "Carl Boenish I: The Early Years" out now.
Unlike you, however, i won't call you out of line for bagging on 460 the way you did, or suggest that you retract your statement because it enables dysfunctional behavior. That's because, as they say in the AI community, "intelligence emerges from the interaction of conflicting elements" and both of you have contributed toward that end with your respective perspectives, so thanks for taking the time to contribute to Marah's project.
In the meantime, maybe the largest investor other than the Norwegian governmetn ought to PM
me since it's clear that he obviously has ABSOLUTELY NO idea how to actually reach the finish line with this worthy project.
44
Robin, I understand that many people would like the film to be finished, I am certainly one of them, but do you really think that is so 'effing' easy? Really? Are you actually involved with this project?
If you knew anything about the project then you would realize that just slapping together a 'carl 1, carl 2, etc.' film just isn't going to happen. Not from Jeans, Marahs, or any of the other contributors standpoint. There are many factors that I don't think you or anyone but the people involved actually see or even care to see. It's not just about restoring old footage and throwing it together and putting it up on youtube. This is a theatrical release and with that comes higher expectations, better quality, higher production value, more time and effort, greater scrutiny, and more money. Money especially since hiring the right people, getting to correct equipment for the various jobs and filling in the gaps in the story with additional footage from various locations and with various people costs more than most can imagine. It would be great if everyone involved were doing this stuff for free but they aren't and a lesser quality production would not fulfill the obligations to Jean and Carl.
I don't believe I'm enabling anything, except enabling Carl's legacy to have some sort of hope to see the light of day. What exactly are you contributing? I'm not sure why the sense of entitlement to see this footage is so prevalent. Yes it's historic and yes it should be seen but thinking you are entitled to see someone else's personal property and in a time frame you dictate is a ridiculous notion. Do you have a right or an interest in any of the footage? If you don't then you really don't have a say in this matter, Only Jean and Marah do at the moment.
If you are so adamant about seeing some of the old footage before the film is released then why not instead of complaining, do something about it such as some fundraising in order to pay for the man hours required to bring forth some of that great footage?
BTW, can you have proper results without first having an intention? Intentions are what results are built upon are they not?
As I said, the major investor in this project obviously has ABSOLUTELY NO idea how to reach the finish line with this worthy property.
Your head is so full of snakes you conjure up things out of thin air, such as claiming that I think I'm "entitled to see someone else's personal property and in a time frame (I) dictate." Congratulations on demolishing a straw man; I said no such thing.
You have so many snakes in your head you ask "What exactly (am I) contributing" when you've never one time reached out to me for my help or expertise, despite the fact that I have more historical and technical knowledge about this subject than pretty much anyone else out there, period, to include a lot of personal conversations with Carl, to include perhaps THE definitive interview ever done with him. So far, neither you nor any other soldiers in this allegedly vast production army of yours has ever bothered to make use of it, or especially of the raw interview material, which is two or three times as much material as what was published.
You run around chasing your tail for years trying to put this together, learning on the fly, when I could have saved you enormous amounts of time, money and frustration and maybe even helped you put together financing that would have helped you see this project to the finish line which from what you say on this thread you still can't even see, much less actually reach.
I asked you to PM me; instead you choose to grandstand and pick a fight with someone who'd love to see this project come to fruition.
More snakes in your head when you write: "Do (I)have a right or an interest in any of the footage?"
This has nothing to do with the technical and strategic questions I posed or the strategic design variations I posited.
Theatrical release? Really. For something this narrow in scope? Really.
There are multiple other avenues through which to release and/or present a property such as this without going the theatrical route, where your P&A costs in many cases are bigger than your production budget -- or your projected ROI.
More snakes in your head: Characterizing my observations of this process and 460 comments thereabout as "complaining" and being "so adamant about seeing some of the old footage before the film is released."
Silly boy. I don't need to see it; I've already seen it. I have a lot of it on VHS and 16 mm. Other of that old footage, I either watched it with Carl or was there when it was filmed; in fact, I filmed some of it myself. In fact, the reason I filmed some of it myself was that Carl called me up at midnight one August 1979 day and asked me if I could keep a secret -- followed by the inimitable giggle of his.
Thus did I become part of his film crew for what he called "the second most important development in BASE jumping" (the Royal Gorge Bridge jumps), thus did I make my first BASE jump, and thus am I here on this forum 33 years later trying to help you see some light by suggesting some ways you can extricate your head from its current dark location.
Truth be told, I know more about your project than you think I do; I just choose not to air its details on this forum. As I said, 460 is fundamentally right; they -- and you -- need to finish this, and not leave it in Development Hell forevermore.
And it's become clear to me through this thread that while the job may or may not be too big for Marah and Jean, it's definitely too big for you, or you woudn't be publicly displaying all the snakes in your head.
We are not your enemy, Jason. You should reach out to us instead of striking back when we offer input, look at yourself instead of belittling us when we ask for accountability, and reflect a little instead of just retort
And to answer your final questions: Yes, you need intentions before you can have results, but:
Intentions are not a plan.
Intentions are not knowledge.
Intentions are not good judgment.
Intentions are not action.
So I say again: if the largest investor other than the Norwegian government is serious about actually reaching the finish line with this worthy project, he ought to PM me instead of wrestling snakes.
44