Re: [anonymous1010] Gear Cost -- About to pull the tirgger, need second opinion
In reply to:
So you are saying that the Troll has an in-effecient vent design? And that that is the reason it needed 5 vents?
I don’t see where Todd writes about Troll vents. Todd does write that “When we tested a similar design we did not like the way the inflowing air was restricted.” Have you done any testing on BASE equipment?
In reply to:
Or are you saying that Consolidated Rigging and BaseTroll rely on Skydiving sales?
Consolidated Rigging doesn’t make parachutes. Their design is produced by PD in Honduras. Atair sells two skydiving parachutes. I have no idea how many of them they sell.
In reply to:
Or are you saying that Apex's valve design takes longer to manufacture than the MDV?
I’m not the one pretending to understand how long it takes to build a BASE parachute. Have you worked in parachute manufacturing?
In reply to:
Or are you saying that Apex didn't back flip on the topic of centre cell venting?
Back flip? Apex has been leading the sport in innovation since back in the BR days. Did every manufacturer back flip on Velcro closed containers when the industry moved to pin closed?
In reply to:
Please point out where I was speaking bullshit on any of Todds comments that I addressed for the OP. Variable Vtec does create its share of production issues, it’s not a cookie cutter assembly line, it’s custom built. Yeah right. Custom built to the cookie cutter template that they have been using for the last decade.
When I toured the Apex factory I didn’t see any canopy templates. They showed me a computer aided hot-knife that ran off CAD software.
In reply to:
You can have the most rigorous QC on the planet but that will only up hold the poor design that they use. I have spoken personally with both Todd and Jimmy regarding several aspect of their designs that I do not like. Guess what their answer was. It is easier to build that way. Not better just plain easier.
Well, I do not know why Todd said it is easier, but it is probably because if you are as recalcitrant in person as you are on the web, he realized that no answer would quell your arrogance and argumentative personality. But I am only speculating. Stop saying things that you cannot support.
In reply to:
Educating people with flawed material for your own financial profit is not cool.
What flawed material?
In reply to:
It's not my argument it's called aerodynamics. The first 10% of a zp top skin has the most beneficial effect. I bet you wouldn't notice the difference between a 15% ZP nose and a 30% ZP nose and yet Apex took it upon them selves to charge people extra for it.
So then you haven’t jumped a canopy with a 30% ZP leading edge and compared it to one with a 15% leading edge? Apex BASE only does BASE jumping. You are clearly someone who considers themselves the biggest of “big deals” but it is obvious your bark far exceeds your knowledge. I suggest calling Todd and having him send you the data from the fluid dynamics testing that they paid to have done. He showed the data to me when I did the tour. He will probably show it to you. However, I suspect he will never get that call from you.
In reply to:
Then please explain how there was no accurate information in the email he sent to ski00nut?
Ok. Please see below.
In reply to:
Todd says: Yes, we vent Ultralite canopies. We treat our Ultralites like any BASE canopy. We use them in all types of jumps- slider up, slider down, static line, terminal, sub terminal, cliff, bridges, ...
Accurate
In reply to:
Todd says: The way I understand it, the troll has 5 vents
Accurate
In reply to:
Todd said: they don’t offer a variable configuration
I didn’t think they did and I haven’t seen any being jumped
In reply to:
Todd said: Variable Vtec does create its share of production issues, it’s not a cookie cutter assembly line, it’s custom built
I have no way to confirm or deny this statement, but then again, you have no support to the contrary.
In reply to:
Their vents are much smaller and their cover is a completely different design
Accurate
In reply to:
Todd said: When we tested a similar design we did not like the way the inflowing air was restricted
Are you saying that you were at the testing of Todd’s design and the airflow wasn’t restricted? If that is the case, then I will stop right here.
In reply to:
So they need to have more vents
We should probably ask Stane why the Troll has more vents
We all know he meant BJ. The BJ and Ace are the same airfoil the BJ just has vents use a much closer vent design but they hinge their cover/valve at the front of the vent, but none-the-less...Accurate
In reply to:
Todd said: In our design the pivot point is moved forward for 2 reasons
Accurate
In reply to:
Todd said: One it allows a greater opening for inflowing air
I have no way to confirm or deny this statement but neither do you
In reply to:
Todd said: It also allow easier movement of the cover to get out of the way of the inflowing air
I have no way to confirm or deny this statement but again, neither do you
In reply to:
Todd said: Both of these canopies are built by companies whose main business is in skydiving who copied our vent idea and have not changed it since introduction.
The advent of canopy venting for BASE application was showcased at BD by Consolidated Rigging and Basic Research. Both companies claimed to have invented the technology. You will probably find the center of a tootsie pop before the accurate answer to this.
In reply to:
Todd said: We, on the other hand, have continued to develop the vent and vent cover design to fit the desires of our customers. We were the first company to use vent technology. We originally introduced the vents with 4 of 7. We realized we could vent as many cells we wanted to and experimented with a couple configuration in the early days. But quickly realized that the vent idea was radical enough that it was going to be difficult to gather data and promote the vents if we had 5 or so different configurations. So we opted for one, 4 of 7. After several years of use the vents had proven themselves. At that time we introduced the variable vents to the market. At that time it was easier for everyone to understand and implement the information
Accurate
In reply to:
Todd said: You mention hard openings. Yes on occasion any parachute can give you a hard opening. But this is not the norm. There are a host of Micro Reefing techniques that BASE jumpers use to adjust the opening speed to fit their needs. Check out http://apexbase.com/files/02c0ffa48588b710bee2544fdf5f3a74_15034.pdf page 5 for more on Micro Reefing. Sometimes a jumper will use several techniques, or maybe just one or two. There are numerous variables to consider when reefing a parachute some include- airspeed at deployment, age/performance of the parachute, desired opening speed, opening AGL and MSL, and more. BASE jumping requires a far more intimate relationship between the equipment and the user. It much like a climber and the different techniques used if you’re climbing on ice or granite, if you’re lead climbing or just top roping. In skydiving it doesn’t generally matter if you’re doing a big way, or free flying or doing RW the equipment and the pack job remain the same. The same is NOT true with BASE.
Accurate
In reply to:
Again, then why did he send an email to ski00nut full of incorrect information? Information that attempted to make MDV venting sound inferior.
It sounds like you are a little sensitive when it comes to the MDV system. I can relate. I used to get the same way when my friends talked about me masturbating… but then I graduated junior high.
In reply to:
Nope. Just don't appreciate them perpetuating mis-information. For the record I think that they make some of the nicest pilot chutes out there.
I still fail to see your point or any examples / support.
In reply to:
You are right that they are definitely better than some. On par with others though.
I’m sure each customers experience differs. In my experience, no one else even comes close.
In reply to:
I didn't ask if it was worth your time. I asked who decided it was cool to charge $45 for $2 in material and 5 minutes of work. The price seems a little inflated to me. And that doesn't even take into account that carry with you static lines are a joke.
If you’re asking if it’s cool if a company makes a profit, then my answer is yes. For all the bullshit you spout, I see no evidence to back it up. I see Apex supporting events, providing great customer service, engaging in research and development, and sharing their results for all to benefit. What are you doing again other than spouting off at the mouth with absolutely no support of what you say just to slam a manufacturer for whom you obviously have a grudge? I use the carry with so I am not leaving break cord all over our A's. But, I like jokes, so I guess that makes sense.
In reply to:
They must be wasting it then seeing as their competitors are the only ones releasing new canopies. Canopies that arguably out fly anything from Apex.
I was a high performance canopy pilot when I skydived a lot, a paragliding pilot, a speed-wing pilot, and I’ve flown just about every BASE canopy on the market. I’ll admit that there are some minor differences between models. However, even the manufacturers will tell you that there are more similarities than differences. As far as I know, none of the manufacturers have done any sort of competitive data collection on opening forces, glide, forward speed, etc. Do you know of support to the contrary? I would love to see your data. I'll even buy the beers while you share it with me.
In reply to:
Then you couldn't honestly say that Apex is the same quality as other gear on the market. Again I will re-iterate that I did not say it was un-safe in any way. Just not as high quality as other manufacturers.
I read what you wrote and understood what you meant. I just don’t see it. In my opinion, Apex and Morpheus have the highest manufacturing standards in the industry.
In reply to:
Again I would like you to point out where I am factually wrong in what I addressed in regards to the OP. All you have done is take offence to me saying that Apex gear is of cheaper quality than other manufacturers. Please address how you think I am wrong in respect to the points I addressed about Todd replying to the OP with totally incorrect information therefore mis-educating somebody that is now going to go out and spread that incorrect information.
I am pretty sure that the misinformation is coming from you. I am not the one slamming other manufacturers with absolutely no basis for doing so. As I stated, with the gear I jumped from them, I liked them, however, I prefer Apex. If you came on here slamming Morpheus, I would tell you your just as full of shit, as I would if you slammed Marty.
If you wish to debate it further, meet me at Apex at your convenience and all of your misinformation can easily be dispelled. I’d even be will to set up a live video feed so the rest of the BASE board can watch. (Disclaimer: Apex may not allow this, but I am game)
Short of that, I am done with you. Wise men never argue with fools, because people from a distance can't tell who is who.