Basejumper.com - archive

for real..........i just spent a half hour on the can texting, bullshitting, and drinking a corona

Don't you hate it when you poop to quick and don't have enough time to play on your phone!

I lol'd when I read this

Being a chick, is it socially acceptable for me to comment on loaf pinching?

My only female BASE student has yelled
I have to poop as she exited, I laughed
so hard she is lucky I didn't drop her bridle.

This is so weird. I am sitting on the toilet, got my AR-15 propped up in the corner, just finished a puzzle on my Lego puzzle app, now I'm searching the forums, scratching my balls and trying to get one of my dogs to go lay down and I just noticed my left leg is a sleep cause I've been sitting here for thirty minutes and still haven't dropped the first terd...

I'll be 28 years old in less than a week and the thought of someone pooping and farting still makes me laugh. I hope I never grow up.

Will you marry me?

We would be perfect for each other. It would be a win-win situation. I poop and part A LOT, AND, I love to make people laugh, AND I too never want to grow up.....

If ratemypoo.com is still around, it's always good for a laugh or two....

Walt

No doubt she's a keeper!

Walt

Speaking of poop, I have two words for you... Veronica Moser.

For those who don't know who Veronica Moser is and are curious, do this:

1. Get a 16 oz. ball peen hammer

2. Remove your shoes and socks

3. Beat your toes really hard with the hammer

4. Writhe in pain that is so intense you will have zero interest in looking up Veronica Moser on the internet.

5. Repeat as necessary

You will probably not thank me for this but if you check Veronica Moser out really thoroughly, you might wish you had taken my suggestion.

Her flicks are not as bad as the pain olympics or one guy one jar, but bad enough.

Oh, and be very leary of clicking in any links 460 might post in this thread, no matter how innocuous they may look.

Walt

twisted.... oddly Em loves it when I take a dump on her lap! hahahaha

weird walt, i still dont know who this person is, but your story reminds me of two things...........

first the tanya harding/nancy kerrigan scandal, and also that fucking bitch from the movie misery, that hobbled that motherfucker............
"its for the best, paul...."

Fuck, now I'm gonna have nightmares tonight about this fucked up scene!

Walt

Congratulations To All on BASEjump.com : You have now reached the Ass-End of the internet .
.

Oh fuck I did it! I googled Veronica Moser and I can't believe what my eyes have seen oh god why didn't I listen to Walt!

I googled it too, but I only read the description in the results. That was plenty enough for me.

Spoiler alert, Veronica Moser does scat porn, which sounds disgusting and obviously fake, since everyone knows women don't poo.

i did a google image search and was subjected to dozens of photos of her sucking crap off of her fingers, deep throating shit sticks and drinking urine from a goblet.

It must've been someone else's because you're right women don't poo.

The internet just fucking amazes me the subhuman trash that feels the need to share there Fucked-up sick lifestyle choices . It is conscience choice of sick mutherfuckeres who are so fucked-up they don't know there are miss-wired in the brain and born void of basic human behavior values of right & Wrong that majority humans are born with & agree .


A prime example of mis-wired human trash born void of basic knowledge of right & wrong human behavior shared by the majority ?

http://www.animal.org.au/...lbum?albumid=9406703
.

That is extremely fucked up if true.

Walt

there is a huge difference between two consenting adults eating each others shit and humans raping a shaved gorilla...both are fucked but one is morally reprehensible.

Moral wrong, is what is behaviors and thought that is in agreement by the majority as bad . As well as (sense of moral) what seems to be genetically foreordain & placed in 'most' Human brains as they are developed in womb to birth .

(freeflow) quote >..." morally reprehensible " :
That is just steps-up the 'Very Same' twisted path, but to little different & higher plateau of moral wrong .
& interpreting one to be greater than another is slippery slop but some obviously worse to degree .
-

OK . Given choice of what majority of humans agree as different degree's of Moral Wrong .
Which would be worse ?

Eating human Shit
Prostitution and Raping of a shaved Orangutang
Willfully carry-out atrocity against humanity of Genocide, /example - Pol Pot or Hitler
.

semantics aside... in one case you rape a creature against their will (or so you have to presume because this creature cannot tell you whether it likes it or doesn't - most likely doesn't considering) in the other two consenting adults shit in each others mouth for fun.... big fucking difference. If two consenting adults wanna eat each other like those two german freaks...by all means let them. Its about the respect for anothers will.

FAIL . & you were not properly encoded post conception and lacking, as I will explain below .
quote >... " big fucking difference. If two consenting adults wanna eat each other like those two german freaks...by all means let them. Its about the respect for anthers will ".
-
It is more evolved than simple semantic comparison .
Moral wrong, is what behaviors and thought that is in agreement by the majority as bad . As well as (sense of moral) what seems to be genetically foreordain & placed in 'most' Human brains as they are developed in womb to birth .
Also the interpretation/definition of what is Moral wrong . Also self imposed guilt and spiritual agony when doing Moral wrong by human is incredibly similarly shared by the whole of humanity .

The simple choices I typed of degree of, ( less or worse ) is simple semantics .
But you saying ?, "Just because you have a consenting agreement ", between several humans to participate (for example) the shared eating of each others Shit and placing this behavior on world Web. for visual viewing . This makes it a lesser or even acceptable behavior in Moral infraction ' by shared consent ' .

Mutual shared/consent of the few partaking in the Moral Wrong, that is in agreement by the majority of humans as Wrong . Is NOT ' Less' because of the few that are in agreement when participating in it, are consenting .
Just like the few that participated in prostitution and Raping of a shaved Orangutang that were ' in mutual consent ' . They shared similar thought of this as acceptable Moral human behavior while also void of self imposed guilt and spiritual agony when doing Moral wrong when they were Raping the shaved Orangutang .

This just enforces my belief that for 'some' humans . They are so genetically mis-wired and were never encoded by what is shared by the majority . They are damaged and not even able to recognize there behavior flaw with also lacking self imposed guilt and spiritual agony when doing Moral wrong .
.

I don't know how to respond dude. I could either make fun of you, ignore you or try to reason with you. Since I idiotically studied philosphy in college Ill do the latter though the first option does appeal to me the most given you decry me as morally decript(ad hominem on your part btw ...i.e. personal attack on the speaker).

First of I never equated morality and majority consent - ur words...and if u equate the two u do get into really hairy situations (think holocaust and germans believing jews subhuman)

What's right and wrong is pretty easy to determine in most cases...there are many problematic situations but most seem - to me - pretty clear cut and follow from the golden rule (do not onto others yade ya).

Fringe cases exist...do you kill one to save a thousand. How you decided depends largely on your philosophical standpoint

But this is all besides the point. You eqaute rape of an innocent creature two grown ass people doing kinky shit in bed (that in this case doesn't harm any of the participants nor really does any harm to the viewer - unless maybe triggering a desire in the viewer to maybe engage in these same activities (how heinous - you might catch some ecoli)

If you wanna measure morality by majority consent be my guest and put to the vote whether two consenting adults shitting in each others mouth is in any way shape or form analogous to a bunch of grown ass man capturing and traping a gorilla - shaving the fucker - and letting people fuck that gorilla against its will for money.

You will fall by your own maxim.

So long and don't slip and those semantical slopes of yours

Who knew your thread would take this turn. How about another poll that goes,

After pinching a loaf....Do you think it's worse to:

Stick your loaf in someone's mouth for pleasure
Or rape a bald orangutan for pleasure

This being the BASE community and all, it might be better to phrase it something like:

"If you had a choice between going to jail for something embarrassing like fucking a transvestite in public, bouncing, being paralyzed, fucking a shaved orangutan, or having a turd sucked out of your butt by a world-class skank, which would you choose?"

Not a lot of moral ambiguity there, it's really a matter of estimating the impact on your quality of life afterward.

Me, I'd probably choose the turd thing but I'd be really hating life that day....

Walt

 
Hey I am laughing @ you just as much as you are Laugh @ me for your interpretation of the morality of subject mater on this Fecal eating & raping prostituted shaved Ape conversation on Basejump.com . And even though you made educational study that still does not mean you are in clarity .
quote >... " big fucking difference. If two consenting adults wanna eat each other like those two german freaks...by all means let them. Its about the respect for anthers will ".

quote >... " But this is all besides the point. You eqaute rape of an innocent creature two grown ass people doing kinky shit in bed (that in this case doesn't harm any of the participants nor really does any harm to the viewer - unless maybe triggering a desire in the viewer to maybe engage in these same activities (how heinous - you might catch some ecoli) ".
.
Do you not see ?
You are missing the point . Each party . The shit eaters & the Rapists of shaved Orangutang . are of equal Moral standing in the view of the majority .
You thinking. Two party verbal 'Consent' between shit eaters . Outweighing the Shaved Orangutang NOT talking to give consent prior to Rape. This has nothing to do with it . ( ALL Have Consent ) all are equal .
Look at it like this . The Shit eaters give each other mutual consent threw dialogue before participation . The Orangutang Rapists were given Consent 'before participation' from the proprietor of the Whore house & employees that sell shaved Orangutang pussy to the 'Consenting' Orangutang Rapists .

I think ? , we both agree. ' Eating Poo & fucking shaved Orangutang is Wrong '.
But I can not comprehend why people willingly choose to put (for example) eating each others Shit . Up on the internet for all to share in there experience ??? . It goes far beyond just for shock value .
.

I was goofing off with some friends of mine the other day, and making our usual crude-as-hell jokes as military guys will do...

and one guy talking to another says, speaking of your face, I really gotta go take a shit.

according to my maxim eating shit is less 'wrong' then basejumping. I do the latter and not the former (yet? who knows how bored with sex I may get over the years)

Well Necrophilia is far ' less wrong ' morally and illegal also than BASE jumping in Islamic law of Egypt .
We were speaking of ' Consent '. What if your Culture & religious rule of law gave you Consent for what majority of all western culture & all world religions (except one) deem as extremely Foul moral infraction ?

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/...frev00-1226340604074
.

OHhhhh,, Edit to add :
Do you think most husbands would even notice the difference ?
.