Re: [waltappel] PC symmetry question
waltappel wrote:
I think 1 cm is an acceptable tolerance for most jumps, if for no other reason, I think it would be silly to apply extremely tight tolerances to a system component that is not rigid.
True. I'm sure 1cm won't affect PC performance much. That's not my point, however.
If 1cm diff was produced when cutting pieces of tape, any normal person would at a very least do a sanity check when assembling something symmetrical from pieces: lay all pieces on top of each other and verify they're all the same length (and ensure the length is per spec). If that was the case and the check was not done, that's some serious negligence right there.
If 1cm diff was produced when sewing the pieces together, again, you would think that the proper positions of stitches would be marked first and followed at least with some reasonable precision (I don't think 1/8" or 3mm precision is that hard - I have little sewing experience, yet I can do 3mm. You need to be blind not to see the deviation of the stitch from your marks by 3mm. Or intoxicated.)
And then, QC missed it, too. Or they don't even know what QC is at all.
So when you encounter such examples of sloppiness and negligence, you ought to start thinking, "hmmm... what
else they slopped away or neglected?!"
Partied in the same room where the spools of thread are stored, and sparks from those little sparky fireworks damaged the thread used to make life saving equipment?! Cut the tapes drunk, made a small erroneous cut too short, said "ooops", and then cut longer and used this defective piece in production?! Stored fabric or harness webbing close to some chemicals that weaken nylon?!
I wouldn't tolerate negligence like this
on principle, regardless of whether it actually affects visible performance or not. But everyone has their preferences.