Re: [ineed2fly] Pushing the classification "E"
ineed2fly wrote:
Is E just cliffs?
First off, who cares? Define it however you like.
Traditionally, there are two different systems for classifying objects, the "shape" method and the "wind" method.
Wind method:
If the wind blows under it, it's a span.
If the wind blows over it, it's a cliff.
If the wind blows through it, it's an antenna.
If the wind blows around it, it's a building.
Shape method:
A horizontal line is a span.
A vertical line is an antenna.
A plane (flat surface) is a cliff.
A solid, three dimensional shape is a building.
Personally, I think the "ask a five year old" test is superior to either of these. Just ask a 5 year old "is this a building, antenna, cliff or bridge?" and see what she says. If you want to email me a photo of your proposed object, my daughter will be five for another 8 days, and I can get her ruling for you.
I'm also a fan of the "alphabet soup" method, where you try to claim a different letter (a to z) for every object until you've completed the entire alphabet. Antenna, Building, Crane, Dam....collect all 26.
In reply to:
On that note, has anyone ever jumped an ice cliff?
How do you define that? I've jumped a snow/ice wall on top of a cliff. The ice portion was tall enough to jump by itself, but the cliff gave a lot more altitude. I'm sure that lots of people in Switzerland and Norway have done the same.