Re: [waltappel] wow
In reply to:
bootstrap wrote:
I have been getting the same impression as you about skydiving versus BASE, except I still see plenty of danger potential in skydiving. While skydiving looks like a lot of fun and worth doing for the fun of it, I suspect I'll be one of those freaks who incessantly but gradually and methodically tries to learn and practice quick, emergency turns and other skills that might eventually become useful in BASE.
This is a perfect example of how getting ahead of yourself can kill or maim you. By far and away, most skydiving fatalities are under parachutes that are working just fine. Those "quick, emergency turns" kill people. You haven't even made a skydive and you're already "inventing" ways to kill yourself. The problem is twofold. One is that those methods have already been invented. You need to learn how to *avoid* them. Second, those clever little maneuvers you plan on doing can kill others.
Maybe you're right to respond that way, because I didn't state the full story or context. That's what happens when I don't write "the whole novel" every time I post? But I have to ask, why do you assume I won't be very careful about the airspace around me? What makes you assume I won't make sure I'm the last off the plane and highest off the ground when I plan to practice turns? What makes you assume I won't practice these high up in the air where I'm unlikely to have insufficient time to recover? Why do you assume I am necessarily irresponsible?
You see, you don't know me, so you have no way to know whether I have concern for others or not. So I really don't mind your reply, because it might help someone else who reads this thread someday. All I can say here is, maybe I am not what you fear I am. But yes, you have no way to know.
In reply to:
Still think of yourself as something other than an egotistical jerk who doesn't listen to others? You may be the only one who feels that way at this point.
I don't care. What I care about is not harming myself or others. In other words, I care very much about the reality, and not much at all about what others think or say. They own their own brains, and are free to operate them as they see fit. But also, you can be certain that I do
listen to others, and I think about what they say seriously. I just don't lie and say "I agree" until my brain does agree. Sometimes that's immediately, sometimes that's a while later, sometimes a long time later, and sometimes never. But you can be quite confident that I am listening.
In reply to:
bootstrap wrote:
Hopefully that wild behavior under chute doesn't convince people on the ground that I'm a complete spaz, and inherently incapable of skydiving! Hahaha.
No need to worry about that. We won't worry about you being a spaz. We won't worry all that much about you killing yourself (at least I won't). We'll worry about you colliding with someone else and killing an innocent person while you are killing yourself. Think I'm kidding? I've done CPR on an innocent man who was killed by someone who collided with him. They both died. The guy who caused the accident had over 7,000 skydives. The innocent guy had over 6,000. Do you think we're going to put up with a new guy trying to kill us because he has some stupid-assed idea that doing radical maneuvers under canopy will make him a better BASE jumper? Really? Here's a bit of reality for you. The skydiving community is a shitload bigger than the BASE community but it is still small enough that when someone shows themselves to be a dumbass, word gets around very quickly and you will run out of places to jump and people to jump with in a hurry. Multiply x 1000 for BASE.
No, I most certainly do not think you should put up with someone who endangers you! Hell no! However, hopefully if you see some numbnuts performing "crazy" turns while still high above, you'll ask them after they land "what the hell were you doing"... and listen to their answer. If that's not how people work in the skydive community, probably I'll be just as unpopular as I am here. Of course, if I plan to do anything that might remotely require others to know and understand what I plan to do, I'll tell them in advance. But I have zero control over everyone who happens to be on the ground at a drop-zone, so there's no way I can prevent people from drawing wacko conclusions if they don't bother to find out the facts (which few people seem to do in my experience). So be it.
When I used to rock and mountain climb, my climbing partners (who climbed with me before) were always much more willing to trust me than I wanted. Not once did I ever say "trust me", it was always them saying "we've climbed with you before, we know you're alright". Even so, many times I convinced them not to trust me. I'm just saying, when it comes down to
doing things, I tend to be the most risk averse of anyone around. While that's a fact, there's no way you can know or understand this, so your comments are taken as constructive.
In reply to:
bootstrap wrote:
I still have much I want to learn even before my first skydive. Yeah, I know, "they'll tell me everything I need to know". Yes, they probably will. But they won't tell me everything I want to know. Like for example, I've had my head kicked several times for even wondering why I can learn skydiving in the same gear as I'll eventually be doing BASE. Okay, they want a reserve, but somebody said there are "belly reserves" or something like that. I'm perfectly willing to learn and understand why it is utterly and completely insane to practice from the start with the same gear I need to be intimately familiar with for BASE. I'm perfectly willing to learn and understand why forming the "muscle memory" that will be utterly crucial to my survival in BASE can't start sooner. So probably I'll have to be annoying just a little bit longer to get answers satisfactory for this annoying brat.
You are doing a great job of reinforcing the impression you have already made on others. Focus on learning to skydive first or you could kill yourself and/or someone who does not deserve to die at the hands of some egotistical moron.
Look. Try to understand this. Try to listen to exactly what I'm saying, and take it literally, because every time I say it, nobody notices or it just doesn't sink in. Okay, ready?
I refuse to fly under false colors. I refuse to pretend I am someone I am not. I refuse to pretend I have stopped thinking of things you and others don't want me to think of yet. I refuse to be dishonest with you.
You may convince me to do everything your way, eventually. That could happen. But you will
never convince me to lie to you and pretend I believe something or accept something or plan to do something before I mean it. You may not realize it, but what you want me to do is act like most people. To humor you (which is disrespect in my book) and pretend to accept and believe everything you say. That ain't gonna happen. Sorry if it bugs you. Sorry if that makes me seem egotistical. Sorry if the world chooses to equate "honest" with "egotistical".
And by the way, where did I get the idea to practice quick turns during skydiving way high up in the sky? From "the great book of BASE". That's where. Now, I'm not saying I'd practice those turns during skydiving just because "Matt said so", because that's not true. It just made sense to me. No, not during AFF, and probably not for dozens of jumps after, and then baby-step by baby-step (which means, gentler turns first, then gradually quicker). What, you think I started my springboard diving "career" with a reverse 1.5 with 1.5 twists? No, that was years later. Why you even imagine in your wildest dreams that anyone would start that way... never mind... you're right about that. Some people are that stupid. Sorry. You win this time. Got me!
In reply to:
bootstrap wrote:
I'm quite aware BASE is dangerous. In fact, the more I read and learn about what BASE jumpers do, the stronger my original impression becomes. I refer to my original desire to
never jump from problematic exit points. Never. I can't even count the number of un-freaking-believably fantastic high diving exit points I passed on for exactly this reason, even though
probably I would have been just fine diving from every single one of them. The more I read, the more I get the impression a great many BASE jumpers have a strong desire to jump from every last exit point they can find. I imagine me being opposite. I want to
enjoy the activity, not impress someone, scare myself witless or worse.
If you put as much thought into what kind of skydiver you are going to be instead of figuring out what kind of BASE jumper you are going to be, we would all be safer.
I promise to go much further out of my way than anyone else around me to never risk harm to anyone else, you included.
In reply to:
bootstrap wrote:
This raises another question that I have yet to learn or understand. The "great book of BASE" says that
by far the most injuries and deaths are caused by striking the object we're jumping from due to off heading and tangled lines. That was my impression too, even before I read the book. And that's why I said that seems far less likely with a wingsuit that gets us vastly further from the object when we deploy the chute. But people here said BS to that, for reasons I still cannot fathom (since they didn't bother to explain why that's so). For the life of me, I still can't understand why wingsuit flying from BASE isn't safer than regular BASE. I'm not talking about proxi... the potential dangers of proxi are obvious. I'm talking about flying 1km ~ 2km from the object before we deploy. How can that be more dangerous than regular BASE...
Look at your precious youtube videos of wingsuiting. Notice the position of the arms. Now imagine someone whose arms are restricted by the wingsuit trying to deal with a wildly-spinning malfunctioned parachute after a low opening. They have to get their arms free of the wings before they can grab the controls.
I totally buy all that. But they explicitly said the danger of striking the object we're jumping from is just as dangerous for wingsuit BASE. Of course wingsuit flying has risks that don't exist in regular BASE. I'll repeat myself. Hitting the jump object is supposedly the biggest killer in BASE. I was only saying that
one danger should be reduced in conventional (non-proxi) wingsuit BASE. That's all I said. That's all I meant.
Sure, I understand how people can take advantage of the wingsuit horizontal clearing performance and start jumping off things that are impossible or crazy for regular BASE. No matter what people are doing they can push it to and past the limit. That's a fact, and that was clear before I posted in this forum. What was also clear to me is... never before have I been the guy "pushing it" like that, and I have no intention of being anywhere even remotely close to "pushing it" in BASE. That's just not me.
In reply to:
bootstrap wrote:
So yeah, I still have lots of curiosity and lots and lots and lots that I want to learn and understand... before I even think about thinking about jumping.
And none of it will keep you or the rest of us safe while you should be learning to skydive.
If I knew for sure that was true, I'd shut the frack up.
In reply to:
bootstrap wrote:
I don't know how to answer your comment about "challenging" advice. I "challenge" everything and everyone, myself more than anyone! I guess I enjoy "challenge" of this kind, and deep down just don't understand why people dislike that. This is not a challenge to a duel where somebody gets hurt or killed, afterall. So yeah, obviously I just don't get why so many people respond that way. Just consider me a clueless doofus for this.
Because we've seen too many people hurt or killed by "reinventing" some aspect of the sport. BASE is not some academic intellectual exercise. It's as real as it gets. Same goes for skydiving. Listen and learn.
I am listening. And as much as I may seem to "push back", I am also retaining your advice for further consideration. Any evidence that tends to collaborate what you say will give it more weight. I'm not rejecting what you say, I'm just not fully accepting it until I fully believe it myself. Maybe you don't see that either, which makes sense, because that's hidden away deep inside my head.
In reply to:
bootstrap wrote:
If I ever get skilled at this, I hope I can look back at this thread and smile, shake my head, cringe, and remember what it was like to be totally clueless at the start of a long journey.
We're not worried about you getting "skilled at this". We're concerned about you getting
killed at this and possibly killing someone else because you have your head somewhere other than the important tasks at hand.
You certainly did not help your case with your most recent post but I hope you take my comments to heart. Not trying to be harsh here, but you need a reality check in a big way.
I'm also starting to think the poster who said you need to ditch your profile and start over and not leave any clues that would enable anyone to figure out who you are at the drop zone was right.
Still, I wish you the best of luck. And if your luck goes bad, I hope you only hurt yourself.
edited to add:
Sorry if these seems like I'm beating the point to death, but have you hear the expression, "Don't be
that guy"?
Enough said.
Walt
Your advice is appreciated, even if I'm not YET able to fully embrace everything. Our biggest problem is, you're not inside my head. If you were, I'm sure you'd be a lot more comfortable about my prospects, and you'd definitely stop worrying about me being careless with anyone else's life. I take everything you said as good will, and you should take everything I say the same, even if you don't like it.
PS: In my experience, there are two ways to get out of trouble. The first is "think far ahead, and avoid getting into the trouble in the first place". The second is, "think and act quickly and wisely". From my perspective, lots of very skilled people seem to get away with just the second for a long, long time. What you see herein is me trying the first way, because I'm certain it has prevented me from getting into deep doodoo many times before.