Basejumper.com - archive

Incidents

Shortcut
KL close calls 2010
I am getting quite provoked when I see videos from a high profile event like KL. A event with more than 10 years successful jumping.

Slim was one of those rebels, but when you did put him in charge as the organizer, it was a different story. Smooth organizing with high safety attitude.
http://www.facebookvideodown.com/...rnage-hq--28872.html
Shortcut
Re: [434] KL close calls 2010
434 wrote:
I am getting quite provoked when I see videos from a high profile event like KL. A event with more than 10 years successful jumping.

Slim was one of those rebels, but when you did put him in charge as the organizer, it was a different story. Smooth organizing with high safety attitude.
http://www.facebookvideodown.com/...rnage-hq--28872.html


HAHHAHA Special Tom is out there in a WS landing through tree's!!! you're doing it wrong!
Shortcut
Re: [JBag] KL close calls 2010
told ya jbag not long now...
Shortcut
Re: [MBA-PATTO] KL close calls 2010
434. What's the problem. This is only about being cool so you can show off at youtube. You are getting old. It really does not matter if somebody get's hurt or worse. Quote "Even if they close down the event, at least I jumped it".
Shortcut
Re: [Ronald] KL close calls 2010
You are right Im getting old and grumpy in the morning! Sorry about that! But these motherfuckers deserves to be ass shaved for the lucky hairs and raped by the biggest ladyboy in town.
Shortcut
Re: [434] KL close calls 2010
434 wrote:
You are right Im getting old and grumpy in the morning! Sorry about that! But these motherfuckers deserves to be ass shaved for the lucky hairs and raped by the biggest ladyboy in town.

As you can see from their behaviour, they might even like it.
Shortcut
Re: [434] KL close calls 2010
Lets show them to the world:
http://www.facebook.com/...192&notif_t=like
Shortcut
Re: [boachanoff] KL close calls 2010
There is more than 70 persons who shared that link on facebook already!
Shortcut
Re: [434] KL close calls 2010
i t's only what i think but basejumping is not a game and it's when you lose a friend you can understand that..
these guy are very lucky to be in life.
Good jump;
ps: Hello Paul!!how are you in Norway??
Shortcut
Re: [434] KL close calls 2010
Maybe there should be an IQ test restriction for participation! Wink
Shortcut
Re: [434] KL close calls 2010
that place is starting to look like bridge day!
Shortcut
Re: [Dominik] KL close calls 2010
This is my favorite coment so far

Name : zmorlock
Date : 2010-10-11 01:44:12
How else are we gonna "jump in" the kids of BASE. Plus who really cares if BASE jumpers die, it's what we do. Stop telling people how to die.

But I fixed the last word for him.
Shortcut
Re: [434] KL close calls 2010
I'm going to speak out for the organisers as they seem to have come in for some critisism on FB. I'm not a fan of rules and that's one of the reasons I BASE. However, an event like this - attended by some of the dudes who were there needs some rules to keep a level of safety so the event doesn't get closed down. There were rules in place from the start of the event - 6 secs max delay, 36" smallest PC, the night jumps on Sat were flat & stable solo's only. On every morning brief we were told to open higher. If the future of the event suffers because of this bad publicity, it's more to do with our actions as jumpers than the organisers...
Shortcut
Re: [Dominik] KL close calls 2010
...looks to me like - brainless - fun...
Shortcut
Re: [pjc] KL close calls 2010
No rules is good! Thats what we all like, but we do know it doesnt work to good.

There is just one thing to think of: Have respect for other peoples objects when you go visiting other places.

This year the Troll spire was first time flown head down by the Soul flyers. I just do not know what to say when high profiled jumpers do such things in that area. Is it okay to play hard in a exposed area like that?
Shortcut
Re: [434] KL close calls 2010
<sarcasm>
I bet those jumpers hope the National Park petition gains traction. just thing of the fun they can have from the Cap!
</sarcasm>
Shortcut
Re: [wwarped] KL close calls 2010
Hey If they leave no footprints, Tailgate Rubber-bands or trash on the exit, It's all cool groovy and green though .
Ya know if they ever legalize Yosemite Cal. it will be a fucking bloodbath . EASY to imagine. You take El Cap, Then party-on with a Twin Falls Mentality ? Holy Hell !
.
Shortcut
Re: [434] KL close calls 2010
Thanks for the fix 434. But Seriously it's like people with some base jumps forget that they still are mentally defunct for BASE jumping. Even though this video should have been more discreet. Ha-ha we are all gonna die, enjoy the future that we have created BASE jumpers:)
Shortcut
Re: [434] KL close calls 2010
Seriously who the fuck let special Tom jump at this event? I thought there where jump number minimums and some one has to vouch for your skills. Who gave special Tom a good recommendation because they need to sit down and be talked to. You can't have people that aren't competent enough to keep themselves alive at high profile events like this. Sorry Tom I really don't want to see you go in but you don't have the skills or mentality to survive this lifestyle much longer.
Shortcut
Re: [ian3060] KL close calls 2010
hahahahahahhahahhah someone said it...WinkWink
Shortcut
Re: [MBA-PATTO] KL close calls 2010
MBA-PATTO wrote:
hahahahahahhahahhah someone said it... Wink Wink

ok, now that we are making fun of people, I may as well chime in :

did tom ever get lost when getting to the top of KL ?
Shortcut
Re: [JBag] KL close calls 2010
you think thats funny?

thats fucking retarded.

jump(er)s like this are the reasons basejumping will never be legal in the states.

a ws jump from kl is a serious jump, and a rodeo is a terrible idea.

theres so much moronic shit going on these days its pathetic.

fuck anyone who thinks that video is funny, or that jump was appropriate.

HOPELESS.
Shortcut
Re: [ian3060] KL close calls 2010
ian3060 wrote:
Seriously who the fuck let special Tom jump at this event? I thought there where jump number minimums and some one has to vouch for your skills. Who gave special Tom a good recommendation because they need to sit down and be talked to. You can't have people that aren't competent enough to keep themselves alive at high profile events like this. Sorry Tom I really don't want to see you go in but you don't have the skills or mentality to survive this lifestyle much longer.

It`s not just Special Tom on that video,,, even though you are right about him,,, met him in Norway while he was doing his first base course,,, but if you pay atension too those 2 young dorks of canadiens,, they are a danger to them selfs as well...sorry guys, but slow down...and have respect.
Shortcut
Re: [elma] KL close calls 2010
In reply to:
they are a danger to them selfs as well...sorry guys, but slow down...and have respect.

What is the benefit if their jumps?
- skill development. NO.
- advancing the sport. NO.
- a facebook photo. MAYBE.
- attracting attention. MAYBE.
- gaining respect. NO.
- turning off potential jump buddies. YES.
.
.
.

Slow down?

Nah - speed up.

And now the national anthem of the BFL:

"Bounce, bounce, bounce, bounce . . . . . "

I don't care if they go in!!!!!

Tongue

BECAUSE,

THEY HAVE PROVEN THEY DON"T CARE EITHER!

IMHO - by being the supreme neanderthals that they are, they are allowing others to laugh at their demise if / when it happens.

Bounce, bounce, bounce, bounce . . . . . .

If this is a little insensitive to their loved ones - maybe they should try and pull their heads in on their behalf. They need some help from somewhere.

If it is a little insensitive to them, well you attracted the audience and response you got by your actions and behaviour. So suck it up cupcakes.

Bounce, bounce, bounce, bounce . . . . . .

Go in, go in, go in, go in. . . . . . . .

Your mission kiddies is to prove YOURSELVES wrong. Don't ever try to convince me of any reason you may have.

Wink Sly Shocked Laugh Tongue Wink
Shortcut
Re: [TVPB] KL close calls 2010
did you make a tune to that one?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utAKwCQ1Njo
Shortcut
Re: [pjc] KL close calls 2010
pjc wrote:
I'm going to speak out for the organisers as they seem to have come in for some critisism on FB. I'm not a fan of rules and that's one of the reasons I BASE. However, an event like this - attended by some of the dudes who were there needs some rules to keep a level of safety so the event doesn't get closed down. There were rules in place from the start of the event - 6 secs max delay, 36" smallest PC, the night jumps on Sat were flat & stable solo's only. On every morning brief we were told to open higher. If the future of the event suffers because of this bad publicity, it's more to do with our actions as jumpers than the organisers...

I agree completely. The KL organisers shouldn't be blamed for any of the jumps that were made by anyone at KL. Everyone there was fully aware of what they were doing. The jumpers involved are the ones who carry the full responsibility. Personal apologies to the organisers if I drew you any unnecessary attention

While it is a high profile event, its also an event where everyone owns the responsibility for their own actions.

If anything I ever do has negative impacts on the event or the sport in general... what can I say to that? I am one of those dumb fu(#$ that has added to the rules that all of us hate.

But to every one of you who feels good criticising anyone from that event, let the (un# who has never sinned throw the first stone.
Shortcut
Re: [AMuppet] KL close calls 2010
FAIL
..." Everyone there was fully aware of what they were doing. The jumpers involved are the ones who carry the full responsibilityy. "
-
No, you are incorrect . IT should read like this.
The individual BASE jumper is in control & carry the responsibility of His/Her own safety. The organizer is in control of the Public event you are attending.
Look here my friend. you definitely need to review your statements in the Post you just laid-out . go to a dozen BASE events and I don't think you would say what you just Posted .
Organized BASE events are in 'Theory' are suppose to Evolve and grow. Not Regress . The personal behavior of the individual jumpers and them pushing the envelope always takes a back-seat to a organized public event . The organizer is the control valve over all the individual jumpers Game-Plan . Along with the control over that the safety of all involved, Public is #1 & the jumper #2, is in the organizers control and there duty to look after with the best of there abilities @ that moment in time . The Game-Plan is Not dictated by the individual jumping.


OK back to the Vid. in the OP in the Thread . We all have done dumb shit but the lead organization of events has to have some measure of sanity in there control . We all hate getting told what to do but WTF ? , ' low altitude urban Rodeo Wingsuit ' ? . Does that sound like a good idea on a normal everyday BASE jump ??? Has it EVER sounded like a good idea to anyone, please raise your hand .
.
Shortcut
Re: [RayLosli] KL close calls 2010
In reply to:
low altitude urban Rodeo Wingsuit

with ass over tea kettle deployment while wearing a gopro....Unimpressed
Shortcut
Re: [78RATS] KL close calls 2010
those guys are tards. that is all Pirate
Shortcut
Re: [MBA-PATTO] KL close calls 2010
I thought of Patto as soon as I saw that video. Not looking forward to the day you say I told you so.
Shortcut
Re: [Lau] KL close calls 2010
It's funny how the idiots always get lucky.
Shortcut
Re: [michalm21] KL close calls 2010
michalm21 wrote:
those guys are tards. that is all Pirate


+1
Shortcut
Re: [AMuppet] KL close calls 2010
In reply to:
But to every one of you who feels good criticising anyone from that event, let the (un# who has never sinned throw the first stone.

Sorry to crap on your hat. If one goes on an organized event.. one must play by the rules. I have never sinned in this way and so yes, I will throw the first stone. 20+ yrs in BASE and I have not done crap like this at an organized event.
Back up your stance and explain who and why was the dufuss on the wingsuit suit rodeo subterm jump.
Explain why the rider slagged the WSr and had an off heading due to asymmetric PC. Explain everything and help us understand the way to lack of understanding of things that are totally obvious.
Fxxk FJC. where is your brain thinking. Go for it. Post it as an example of what not not to do.
Just because one is an idiot youtube poster, does not not mean that should not post idiocy. Youngins could learn but probaly wont. I bet I will be older than you when we meet on the other side. Like it matters..
take care,
space
Shortcut
Re: [base283] KL close calls 2010
 
Talking this through with the jumper, a very good friend of mine, I have the following comments and points. I have highlighted some of the sense in your rant in bold.

Post it as an example of what not to do
Younguns could learn

It was a dangerous and lucky close call. No doubt about that and no excuses - the rider feels like a schmuck for their part in the jump. But for all its stupidity there were some take home messages that are worth sharing with those of you who have an open mind and who may feel like discussing what actually transpired. For one, the rider involved will certainly never do that particular kind of jump again. A small lesson, but one worth sharing. WS base is dangerous enough, subterminal jumps with the corresponding lack of control and time to fix a situation, doubly so and downright stupid.

To understand why the second jump happened, first realise that there were a series of jumps that make up this whole story. The rider had spent a hell of a lot of time watching other jumpers to see how they exit, fly and land. They watched the WSr do a series of jumps that went very well and also asked them about their WS experience. Obviously a day or two of watching isn't enough to learn all you need to. The 1st mistake is not asking for references for another jumper to confirm comments. Do you do that with every jumper you meet?

The first jump the two did together was a successful WS rodeo. The two jumpers talked it through, dirt-dived the exit making sure exit timing was matched, talked through scenarios such as unstable exit and head down exit as well as controls for these - not throwing the WSr back towards a freefall tower strike. The controls haven't been tested so they won't be discussed here. Both jumpers had done several WS rodeos from planes. The rider had been both rider and passenger several times. The jump was discussed with event organisers and as neither of the jumper had done anything stupid that the organisers had seen, they had no reason to think they were about to on this jump.

The first jump went according to plan. A stable student WS exit that separated safely with plenty of height. Right after the jump there were suddenly heaps of other 'volunteers' that were eager to jump on the 2nd try, some were talking about adding additional complexity to the jump, e.g. late exit so they could surf the wingsuit, adding another WS/rider combination to make 2-way rodeos. To Tom's credit, he stuck with what he knew and wanted to try to improve it in small increments. He has obviously learnt something from the experiences of his earlier jumps.

Because it worked, the footage of the first jump wasn't posted. Its not my footage so I'm not going to post what I have.

People didn't ask too many questions, the pair had obviously demonstrated that they could pull the jump off safely at least once, and they were not adding anything to it for the 2nd jump.

The 2nd jump going as shit as it did was probably a good thing. As soon as the 2nd jump went to shit, the volunteers dried up. A plus for what its worth. Seeing the WSr and rider slammed may also deter others from repeating it. Probably won't though.

The reason the rider slagged the WSr.
Because they had a more head down exit on the 2nd jump. The rider left slightly later, and according to plan the WSr extended his leg wing earlier to get the jump flying faster. The rider should have pitched pretty much as soon this happened, but because a more head down exit was anticipated, the severity of the situation wasn't realised as soon as it was meant to.

Explain why the rider slagged the WSr and had an off heading due to asymmetric PC.
With both WS and rider head down, there was no burble to pull the rider onto the WSr's back. When the WS did start levelling off, the rider slammed into the WSr causing both to lose control.
Asymmetric PC was probably a lesser part of the off heading, the unstable deployment meant the rider wasn't stable during deployment, uneven levels of each shoulder is what the rider attributes the off heading to.

The WSr was obviously surprised by the sudden head high attitude immediately before deployment and delayed pitching to stable. Luckily not snagging the trees or zipline on the road.

An example of what not not to do.
I'm guessing you mean 'An example of what not to do'. Your double negatives are confusing and don't add anything to the discussion of how to prevent shit like this from happening.
The only reason I'm writing this response to the emotional posts on this board about so far, is that I hope others aren't dumb enough to repeat it. And for those dumb enough to consider it,maybe for them to take home some of the lessons.

Just because one is an idiot youtube poster, does not not mean that should not post idiocy.
??? What do you mean by this? People should post idiocy because they are idiot youtube posters? For me it means 'don't do things that people may see and post on youtube.' I don't even jump with a camera any more. I jump for me and to share the moments I have with my friends.

I bet I will be older than you when we meet on the other side.
Seriously possible, but if life was a game of who cam live the longest, then we would all be living in cotton wool eating fibre for every meal and exercising because it made us healthy not because it got us laid. Years spent, or value drawn from the time one has? Mate, I seriously hope you live to a ripe old age and that you live every moment to its fullest. Maybe one day we could share a cold beer and talk about dumb shit we've done and got away with.

To the rest of you whinging b!tc#e$. Rather than whining, bullying and generally trying to tear down other jumpers because it makes you feel bigger, maybe you should consider trying to find a way to help them become the kind of jumpers you'd like to spend time with. Slamming them is the easy option and shows a complete lack of brains and understanding of why people jump and the fact that even new jumpers are part of our small tribe. Please work out how to get people to see where they need to change without you having to be a (un#. It'll make all of us enjoy our jumping a whole lot more.
Shortcut
Re: [AMuppet] KL close calls 2010
I remember the first time I met Tom on an exit point. He suggested that I try listening to my ipod in free fall, to quote 'It makes it just like a you tube video'. I have been concerned for him ever since. I was surprised to see him doing the WS rodeo, he seemed to be a more cautious jumper last time I met him. I suppose having a crowd of your peers around you with video cameras brings out the worst in our decision making.
He got his wish tho, he is on you tube.
Shortcut
Re: [AMuppet] KL close calls 2010
Hendrik and Tom, did you ask any of the experienced jumpers advice on doing this?? Say Gary Cunningham for example. Help yourselves by going about things the right way.. Its your responsibilty not theirs to make you someone they want to jump with and not a BFL jumper

AMuppet wrote:
To the rest of you whinging b!tc#e$. Rather than whining, bullying and generally trying to tear down other jumpers because it makes you feel bigger, maybe you should consider trying to find a way to help them become the kind of jumpers you'd like to spend time with. Please work out how to get people to see where they need to change without you having to be a (un#.
Shortcut
Re: [AMuppet] KL close calls 2010
first off, nice post. I'm not saying I agree with everything, but it does enable discussion.

AMuppet wrote:
To the rest of you whinging b!tc#e$. Rather than whining, bullying and generally trying to tear down other jumpers because it makes you feel bigger, maybe you should consider trying to find a way to help them become the kind of jumpers you'd like to spend time with. Slamming them is the easy option and shows a complete lack of brains and understanding of why people jump and the fact that even new jumpers are part of our small tribe. Please work out how to get people to see where they need to change without you having to be a (un#. It'll make all of us enjoy our jumping a whole lot more.

I guess I'm left wondering huh? Generally, EVERY voice of moderation says progress at a reasonable pace and leave margin for error. You actually concede that point in one of your statements. Generally that will mean attempting this sort of stunt on a safer, friendlier object.

Professional skydivers practice their skills and avoid attempting new stuff at Demos. (True, the spud span and BD offer relative safety to try new things, but a low, urban jump?)

The point is, no calm, rational voice would suggest learning how to do this sort of jump off of a low, urban object with everyone watching.

So, if jumpers like this already flaunt convention, how else to get their attention? They act as if their superior skill alleviates the need to follow guidelines. What is the preferred wake up call? Abuse here apparently helped SuperDave. He posted recently how it helped him get his life in order.

Personally, I don't feel comfortable saying, "it was stupid, dumb, you obviously don't listen, you don't develop your skills in slow, progressive steps, but hey, it will be ok!" But that's just me. Smile
Shortcut
Re: [AMuppet] KL close calls 2010
Its nice to see you spent some time explaining the actions of the wingsuiter, and the rider but how much experience do they actually have? The thought they went through for the jump but is this really the point?
This is only a part of the picture, the fact is this is a sanctioned legal event.

The big word to me is respect, respect for the organisers and providers of this event and also for the other jumpers who would really like to come back to this event. Its really not the time to be really pushing the envelope to a point that your giving yourself the chance to be in these situations.

As a result of that day, management really clamped down of the night jumps and were super anxious of there being an incident. I mean we were really close to having a couple of fatalities. If those that were there cant see that then you are blind.

If Tom had of shown some repect for the event, the organisers or the other people there at the event he would not have turned up for the night jumps after quickly checking his canopy, from going through the trees!!! to do a night wingsuit jump with green lasers in his hands towards an unlight oval!!! And not only turn up but sneak around the back of everyone and make his way to the edge,!!! come on give me a break. Thankfully he was noticed along with concern from several of the other jumpers at the top and the technical team denied the jump, "no way" is the quote I got from the organiser.

It seems to me the guy has learned nothing. I would hate to see anything happen to anyone base jumping. Anyone in this sport for any length of time has lost someone they have jumped with or known. There always good people.

No one here in this forum "wraps themselves in cotton wool" other wise we would all be writing in another forum. But why push it so far that you end up killing yourself thats just retarded!! escpecially at a big legal event. As I said I hate to see anyone "go in" but if your gonna do it. Do it out the back of the mountain and not at a big event!! In front of a thousand people, the world press and Fuck it for everyone!!
Shortcut
Re: [AMuppet] KL close calls 2010
I was sorting through your response to provide a competent reply but Bart has nailed it for me. Thanks Bart.
Take care.
space
p.s. The rider seemed like the sane one besides not knowing how to hook up or choose his PC. I am more interested in the rigging history of the PC than the idiocy of the jump.
Shortcut
Re: [zmorlock] KL close calls 2010
Go in on your own time!!
~J
Shortcut
Re: [AMuppet] KL close calls 2010
AMuppet wrote:
...bullshit...

The 2nd jump going as shit as it did was probably a good thing.

...bullshit...

fix'd
Shortcut
Re: [Oink] KL close calls 2010
I would just like to point out some of the guidelines

-Wingsuit Skydives are dangerous preperation. A tail strike could kill you. No tail strike on cliff. Also Cliffs don't crash

-Always fly as far as you can. No one respects someone who pulls high with an average flight. Far = Low Low = cool

-IF your friends say you are progressing to fast, they are not cool. Jeaslous friends = Not cool. Find new friends.

-If trackers outfly you in wingsuit. Get bigger Wingsuit. Or pull lower.

-If scared on exit, ask around for friend to do 2way. More People = More safe.
Shortcut
Re: [FredPot] KL close calls 2010
+1
Shortcut
Re: [bart] KL close calls 2010
In reply to:
If Tom had of shown some repect for the event, the organisers or the other people there at the event he would not have turned up for the night jumps after quickly checking his canopy, from going through the trees!!! to do a night wingsuit jump with green lasers in his hands towards an unlight oval!!! And not only turn up but sneak around the back of everyone and make his way to the edge,!!! come on give me a break. Thankfully he was noticed along with concern from several of the other jumpers at the top and the technical team denied the jump, "no way" is the quote I got from the organiser.

Stuff him.

You know what he wants.

Bounce, bounce, bounce, bounce . . . . . . . .

#160

His choice. Who cares? He doesn't.

Oh sorry, am I being insensitive again?

Tongue

Now, what was that song by Aretha?

R

E
Shortcut
Re: [bart] KL close calls 2010
bart wrote:
Its nice to see you spent some time explaining the actions of the wingsuiter, and the rider but how much experience do they actually have? The thought they went through for the jump but is this really the point?
This is only a part of the picture, the fact is this is a sanctioned legal event.

The big word to me is respect, respect for the organisers and providers of this event and also for the other jumpers who would really like to come back to this event. Its really not the time to be really pushing the envelope to a point that your giving yourself the chance to be in these situations.

As a result of that day, management really clamped down of the night jumps and were super anxious of there being an incident. I mean we were really close to having a couple of fatalities. If those that were there cant see that then you are blind.

If Tom had of shown some repect for the event, the organisers or the other people there at the event he would not have turned up for the night jumps after quickly checking his canopy, from going through the trees!!! to do a night wingsuit jump with green lasers in his hands towards an unlight oval!!! And not only turn up but sneak around the back of everyone and make his way to the edge,!!! come on give me a break. Thankfully he was noticed along with concern from several of the other jumpers at the top and the technical team denied the jump, "no way" is the quote I got from the organiser.

It seems to me the guy has learned nothing. I would hate to see anything happen to anyone base jumping. Anyone in this sport for any length of time has lost someone they have jumped with or known. There always good people.

No one here in this forum "wraps themselves in cotton wool" other wise we would all be writing in another forum. But why push it so far that you end up killing yourself thats just retarded!! escpecially at a big legal event. As I said I hate to see anyone "go in" but if your gonna do it. Do it out the back of the mountain and not at a big event!! In front of a thousand people, the world press and Fuck it for everyone!!

I didn't hear Tom turned up with a WS for the night jumps. After he inspected the canopy and did one more test jump, I never saw him again. We only did one more jump after the events of that day. A flat and stable safely high pull to end things on a good note.

Just checked the 38" PC that is still attached to the rider's rig, the bridle is still attached the same way that it was for the entire event. Evenly loaded in every way and through all the load bearing tapes including the centre support. Camera mal means I can't download pics. PC attachment was checked several times during the event but was never changed. No other top down footage that we have showed any oscillation prior to that jump. Still, the PC swung off hard to the right, pretty sure winds were light during that jump.... hand of god getting him the fu(# out of there?
Shortcut
Re: [base283] KL close calls 2010
base283 wrote:
p.s. The rider seemed like the sane one besides not knowing how to hook up or choose his PC. I am more interested in the rigging history of the PC than the idiocy of the jump.

Rider is definitely not sane.

Brand new PC. Checked each time it was packed during the event. This being a result of attaching it wrongly once and being picked up by a mate. Rest of answer as per previous post.

PC choice was appropriate for the planned delay and canopy size.
Shortcut
Re: [wwarped] KL close calls 2010
wwarped wrote:
first off, nice post. I'm not saying I agree with everything, but it does enable discussion.

AMuppet wrote:
To the rest of you whinging b!tc#e$. Rather than whining, bullying and generally trying to tear down other jumpers because it makes you feel bigger, maybe you should consider trying to find a way to help them become the kind of jumpers you'd like to spend time with. Slamming them is the easy option and shows a complete lack of brains and understanding of why people jump and the fact that even new jumpers are part of our small tribe. Please work out how to get people to see where they need to change without you having to be a (un#. It'll make all of us enjoy our jumping a whole lot more.

I guess I'm left wondering huh? Generally, EVERY voice of moderation says progress at a reasonable pace and leave margin for error. You actually concede that point in one of your statements. Generally that will mean attempting this sort of stunt on a safer, friendlier object.

Professional skydivers practice their skills and avoid attempting new stuff at Demos. (True, the spud span and BD offer relative safety to try new things, but a low, urban jump?)

The point is, no calm, rational voice would suggest learning how to do this sort of jump off of a low, urban object with everyone watching.

So, if jumpers like this already flaunt convention, how else to get their attention? They act as if their superior skill alleviates the need to follow guidelines. What is the preferred wake up call? Abuse here apparently helped SuperDave. He posted recently how it helped him get his life in order.

Personally, I don't feel comfortable saying, "it was stupid, dumb, you obviously don't listen, you don't develop your skills in slow, progressive steps, but hey, it will be ok!" But that's just me. Smile

Rider learnt his lesson watching Tom go through the trees. Anyone who saw his face as he ran back to the viewing platform to see if his mate just went in won't question that. Especially not after the last few weeks here in Aus.

Respect?
Nothing teaches respect more than seeing something like that. Its why there are any old base jumpers at all
Shortcut
Re: [AMuppet] KL close calls 2010
You can add and say what you want. I said nothing about the rider, I dont know the guy but it looked like he actually learned alot and I wouldnt mind betting he was super inexperienced in both Base and skydiving. IT was Tom who showed no respect for the event, the organisers or any of the jumpers by turning up for that night wingsuit jump. I dont know about the last stable open high jump you did. When we were there at 730 pm for the night briefing, Tom was asking for help to check his canopy and standing there wiyth his head buried in his cells. Before begining to pack. After that he turned up at the top after everyone else had done one jump with his wingsuit on and lasers in his hands. And then Sneaking around the exit contoler with the help of another jumper to get to the edge on the far right. As I said before GIVE ME A BREAK!!!.

And I wasnt the only concerned jumper up there that night or at the event about Tom and how he was carrying himself. As I said before I dont want to see anyone bounce. But hey if he wants, I'm fine with that just do it on your own time and not at a major, public event that gives the media and the authorities all the ammo it needs to put us back years and not be able to have these events at all. Go as fast as you want some people can and some people cant some people get lucky and others dont. Just pick ya time and dont ruin it for everyone around you!! Be super cool and die alone!!!CoolCoolCool
Shortcut
Re: [ian3060] KL close calls 2010
ian3060 wrote:
I thought there where jump number minimums and some one has to vouch for your skills.

Maybe you are thinking of back when BASE jumpers used to organise the event. From 2008 onwards the event has been organised by people who know nothing about BASE jumping and have little comprehension of the risks despite being strongly warned. In practice, someone only had to claim they have made a BASE jump and they were in. Strong warnings about some applicants seemed to be irrelevant to the organisers.

The organisers knew what they were getting. They were insistent on showing the world what new inexperienced jumpers can do. They were successful with that.

Both the organisers and the participants need to be much more responsible with these sort of events.
Shortcut
Re: [AMuppet] KL close calls 2010
How were the other jumps with the PC set up? Off heading same direction? Which manufacturer and type of construction? PM me please and we may get it sorted and post the results back on this forum.
Thanks,
Take care,
space
Shortcut
Re: [Dominik] KL close calls 2010
Dominik wrote:
Maybe there should be an IQ test restriction for participation! Wink

+25 ;)
Shortcut
Re: [fastpete] KL close calls 2010
intelligence and good judgement don't neccessarily correlate
Shortcut
Re: [AMuppet] KL close calls 2010
AMuppet wrote:
The first jump the two did together was a successful WS rodeo.

Which makes a 50% success rate. Interesting approach to safety ;)

My point is: Doing something stupid can work well once, it's still stupid...

Not my problem though.
Shortcut
Re: [fab777] KL close calls 2010
You can get away with anything once, repeating it is where this skill comes in.
Shortcut
Re: [fab777] KL close calls 2010
In reply to:
Which makes a 50% success rate. Interesting approach to safety ;)

My point is: Doing something stupid can work well once, it's still stupid...

Well put.

To do something requires a process. BASE jumping is not different and requires a sequential development of skills.

Talking about those skills is only a very small part of the process. You have to physically perform those skills successfully on a number of occasions prior to trying new skills.

The skills need to be learned and developed sequentially. Beignner, intermediate, advanced.

If you are not good enough or experienced enough for advanced, then you have no right to be there.

If you do go there (free spirit, I can do what I want, it;s my life, blah, blah, blah), then people have every right to laugh at you if / when you go in. If you survive, it is more luck than skill.

I am not against doing a rodeo ride off a building in a wingsuit, but the process of getting there MUST be thorough and regimented. Not just turn up and do it because you think it is a good idea and you talked about it.

It should also take a long time too - or a lot of jumps over an intermediate period.

50 jumps off the Perrine in a week does not cut it BTW.

The process would look something like:
- learn to BASE jump
- learn to fly wingsuits
- learn to recover from instability
- do as much of this as possible from an aircraft

- realise that a BASE jump and a skydive are totally different and how you fly recoveries is substantially different.

- try doing the jumps from a balloon or whatever - and get it right a lot of times before going to a building.

- etc (personally, I would add a lot more steps and a lot more detail here but could not be bothered as I think the whole concept is not beneficial at all).

Which brings me to a final point.

WHY?

Before you start this whole process, you should maybe consider why you are doing something like this?

Risking your life for a photo is pretty f$^%^ing dumb (unless you are being offered a lot of $$$$.

The crap I am reading in this forum about some guy with stuff all jumps, a short time in the sport, sneaking around organizers, talking about how to do a jump WITHOUT THE APPROPRIATE PREPARATION (which was extremely evident on the video) reaks of Darwinism and stupidity.
Shortcut
Re: [TVPB] KL close calls 2010
TVPB wrote:
50 jumps off the Perrine in a week does not cut it BTW.

I agree, but I'd take it further than that. If anything, a large number of jumps in a small space of time from an object like that could inadventantly breed contempt for BASE jumping, quite opposite to the experience gained from multiple objects / conditions.
Shortcut
Re: [434] KL close calls 2010
I am sorry for not mention the other organizers who have pulled this great event for many years before and after Slim, but I have only take part of the KL events when slim organized. We are all base jumpers by nature on the good and bad side, but on a high profiled event we should have organizers doing the job, and not people who do not know anything about base jumping. If the community pull together, maybe we can help them to understand this is important for the future base!
Shortcut
Re: [434] KL close calls 2010
Here's POV video from the second jump: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwzmcGKFYvA
Shortcut
Re: [ee1] KL close calls 2010
More proof of Darwinism...
Shortcut
Re: [ee1] KL close calls 2010
whew!

am curious why the guy on the right did not pull the moment he reached back and was on his belly.
Shortcut
Re: [3pin] KL close calls 2010
3pin wrote:
whew!

am curious why the guy on the right did not pull the moment he reached back and was on his belly.

when your head is that far up your butt, it's hard to know which way is up.

44

Cool
Shortcut
Re: [Ronald] KL close calls 2010
Ronald wrote:
More proof of Darwinism...

Actually... it's not.

Dudes are both still in the gene pool.

44

Cool
Shortcut
Re: [robinheid] KL close calls 2010
In reply to:
Dudes are both still in the gene pool.
Laugh Tongue