Basejumper.com - archive

Incidents

Shortcut
Fatality 16 July 2010 Suffolk VA
Update Jul 17, 2010: The article has been updated with the name and a picture of the deceased.

Source: http://hamptonroads.com/...suffolk-cell-tower-0

In reply to:
The Navy has identified the 30-year-old SEAL who died during a BASE-jumping incident early Friday in Suffolk, according to a news release.

Tyler S. Stimson, a Wakefield, N.H., native, was a special warfare operator first class. He was assigned to an East Coast-based SEAL team, the release said Saturday.

Stimson died Friday after he tried to parachute from a cell-phone tower, Suffolk police said.

I didn't really know the guy, but I did see him at the dropzone last weekend. He seemed like a pretty good guy, though. Rest in peace, brother.



standardized the July fatality subjects lines --- wwarped
Shortcut
Re: [soulbabel] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
FrownFrownFrown Please please please somebody PM me info. Or call me you fuckers.
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
Sad to hear the news. Has the name been released yet?

Please PM me if anybody has details. Other nearby jumpers have been asking me what's up.
Shortcut
Re: [soulbabel] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
What the FUCK! Please call or pm me some info!
Shortcut
Re: [SirHoytalot] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
Details are slim to nun so far, I know the jumper but don't know if it's open source info yet. He had talked to some people about this object in the last few days. He wanted to do it freefall. It's a 240' A.
Shortcut
Re: [Davo] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
http://hamptonroads.com/2010/07/navy-seal-killed-base-jump-suffolk-cell-phone-tower
Shortcut
Re: [soulbabel] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
I've updated the opening post to include the name of the deceased, and the link to the updated news article.
Shortcut
Re: [soulbabel] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
That's a real bummer...for many reasons...not to forget the bust that Jason Tompsett took...to not leave a man behind.

He just fucked his career over good...

RIP
Shortcut
Re: [soulbabel] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
Sorry to hear this. Does anyone know how it happened?

BSBD
Shortcut
Re: [gauleyguide] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
http://hamptonroads.com/...mpt-lost-his-balance

In reply to:
SEAL killed in BASE jumping attempt lost his balance

The Navy SEAL who died Friday after trying to parachute from a cell-phone tower apparently lost his balance when he jumped, according to military experts who investigated.

The cord of the parachute wrapped around his leg, preventing it from opening as it should have, said Suffolk spokeswoman Debbie George. There was nothing wrong with the parachute, according to the experts, she said.

Tyler S. Stimson, a petty officer first class who was assigned to a Virginia Beach-based SEAL team, died at the scene.

His jumping companion, 31-year-old Jason James Tompsett, also a Virginia Beach-based SEAL, is charged with trespassing.

Police said the men were BASE jumping, a risky sport that involves leaping from fixed objects with a parachute. The acronym is derived from the four categories from which participants jump: buildings, antennas, spans and Earth.
Shortcut
Re: [soulbabel] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
Hmmm... interesting.

Cause ah, that is quite contradictive to the info I have.

My dad was the medic on duty at 6am at station 9 in Suffolk... the station that responded. And he spoke directly to the medic who was on that call when he relieved him.

For several reasons... I don’t think that is what happened.

And I'm guessing that, "he who just fucked his career over good" will not be posting...? Given the military part of this?

D

Spelling
Shortcut
Re: [soulbabel] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
My condolensces go out to Tylers family and his unit!

Blue skies Brother!
Shortcut
Re: [soulbabel] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
News video that includes a helicopter view of the tower and 911 call:

http://www.wavy.com/...9-1-1-tapes-released

I really don't know too much more than what's reported in the media. I didn't really know the Seals, and considering that the jumper died the morning they were going to have a Seal Team reunion at the dropzone, I'm definitely not going to pry.
Shortcut
Post deleted by Treejumps
 
Shortcut
Re: [Treejumps] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
It's also possible it was a misrouted SL.
Shortcut
Re: Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
I'm very familiar with this particular tower, I used to live just down the street from it. This tower had very specific conditions required to jump it. It had only one real landing area directly to the south and required the jumper to clear some nasty cell antennas. The only landing area to the south was directly at some high tension power lines. Needless to say it required some strong north winds, on heading openings, and good light to avoid the power lines. Since it was in a very dark secluded area, it required at least half a moon to be able to see a damn thing out there. There were no other close by lights. It also has a relatively tough and awkward exit point for beginners. There are no outs.

The two jumpers in this incident chose to go attempt this tower with very little antenna experience. They were both very new to base recently coming back from a fjc at the perrine. None of the local experienced jumpers were consulted or contacted by these two. Apparently they did not see the need to seek local mentorship after their fjc on learning to jump antennas. They went to this tower alone having never jumped it before and without the assistance or accompaniment of an experienced tower jumper who has.

At the time of the jump, wind conditions were steady south winds and less than a quarter moon. The two jumpers chose to jump into a head wind from 246ft. Very few of the local jumpers had ever freefell this tower because it was not very beginner friendly to do so.

If there is anything that you can take away from this incident, I would hope it would be the following. I know none of these are new and they have been repeated until people are blue in the face, for the hope of preventing another fatality amongst over-zealous beginners:

1) Never jump hard objects into a head wind.
2) Always contact the experienced locals.
3) Quoted from right here on BJ:

In reply to:
Once you have completed your first jump course (FJC), don’t go home thinking you are now a qualified BASE jumper. The first jump course teaches the bare minimum to allow you to safely jump from the object your course was at (usually the Potato Bridge, unless you took your FJC in Europe).

Your first jump course may have discussed the theory for other objects, but it is simply impossible to aquire all knowledge required to safely start jumping other sites. It is therefore important that you have a good follow up plan for after your first jump course. You should have this plan in place before you take the course, especially when it comes to finding a mentor.
Find a Mentor
Your mentor will be the person that can transform you from an overly excited skydiver that thinks he knows how to pack a BASE rig and do a bridge jump, into a self reliant BASE jumper that has sufficient gear knowledge and site analysis skills to avoid a certain death.

Don’t skip this step. It is very easy to come home from a first jump course and think world has become a dropzone. In due time, it will be. But you need to learn a lot more before you can expand your horizons. You will be amazed by the number of things you will learn from jumping with more experienced people. The amount of little things that your FJC didn’t touch on, but can save your life some day, is incredible.

These three rules are rewritten again in blood.
Shortcut
Re: [Davo] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
Tyler had expressed interest in freefalling it, but i just heard that both of the jumpers static lined...
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
Bones: I'm sure you intentions are good and that you only want to prevent future accidents but please be careful in your wording.

They did consult with local jumpers. That is how they found out about this tower and others in the area. I was told about BASE Etiquette and how local knowledge is gained from them. They seemed very serious and impressed with this etiquette and I would be VERY surprised if they intentionally ignored it. Whether they followed all the advice and etiquette I'm not sure because I don't know it and I wasn't there.

Again, I wasn't there but I strongly doubt they jumped into a headwind. I have jumped with Tyler off an Antenna and this was a CONSTANT concern of his.

I would not use the words "over-zealous" to describe what happened here. From what I was told, all the proper steps were in place. There may have mistakes made and I know VERY little about this sport but I feel strongly that over-zealous was not their attitude. My jump with Tyler was very methodical. Everything was briefed, steps explained, back up plans and outs discussed, etc.

I'm not trying to start some internet battle with you. I just don't like hearing a friend described that way when I STRONGLY doubt those words to be the case here.

Anyways, best of luck to those that continue in their pursuit of happiness.
Shortcut
Re: [240d] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
http://www.wunderground.com/...q_statename=Virginia

Read it for yourself man. I know this tower well and it none of its jump requirements were met: Strong north winds and good moonlight.

Contacting and consulting with local experienced jumpers does not mean ask the local skydiver with a couple bridge day jumps and a pca or two from McK where to find a sketchy tower. Seeking post fjc mentorship does not mean show up to a non-beginner friendly tower alone. Had they contacted the local experienced jumpers, one would have been there by their side to help do it right.

Most incidents happen because somebody made poor decisions. Even though the deceased is always somebody's friend, father, husband, son, etc, it doesn't mean they didn't screw up. I have lost several friends in the sport and it's usually because they made some stupid decisions. This will not be the last friend of yours to burn in, unless of course, you're next.

What should have happened:
1) The two should have never even gone to the tower without the help and accompaniment of an experienced tower jumper. Perhaps the mentor they should have had?
2) Once at the tower, the incorrect weather conditions should immediately have sent them home.
3) Sometimes every base jumper is met with the time where you're already up the tower and realize the winds are off, but nobody likes to climb down. Experience and a voice of reason would have said "hey man let's climb back down, this tower will be here tomorrow".

Every experienced base jumper has had to climb back down at some point. It's almost always the new jumpers or the next on 'the list' ones who don't want to.

If you take offense to the words 'over-zealous' than for you, I'll take it back. I thought 'over-zealous' was a polite way of putting it. So what word would you use for an inexperienced jumper who would rather show up at a tower that is not for beginners, without any mentor or local experienced tower jumper, choose to climb it despite incorrect weather conditions, then jump it despite incorrect weather conditions?
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
Climbing down is often the best decision you will every make. My last two climbs we came down because of winds. We still have no idea what happened on this jump other than another one of us lost his life. This surprises me because there was someone with them.
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
Dude,
A little empathy is in order on this thread please, not conjecture from must-have-been-this-and-only-this judge and jury. Even if you are the resident expert on this object, you weren't there. Weird things happen, sometimes very weird. Even from experienced jumpers.
I used to think that the Incident forum was for "need to know the cold hard facts on every fatality so others may learn". As I've lost numerous friends over the years, I feel that the Incident forum needs a little more empathy and compassion for family and friends along with those facts, and much less finger-pointing. Shit happens... and it sucks.

To Tyler's family, sending you positive vibes in your hours of hurt. To his companion who watched him die, wishing you peaceful dreams.

Richard
Shortcut
Re: [flydive] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
sorry, I disagree.

Empathy is 100% useless when it comes to incident discussion. It makes a person weaker and less logical. It cannot help the diseased, but can still help those of us who *may* make a similar mistake in the future.

Not wanting to hurt other persons feelings by not telling them that whatever they are doing is beyond their skill level may be a very nice and empathetic thing to do, but it is in fact a very wrong thing to do.

In my opinion desensitized discussion of BASE jumping is much better than a lallygagging please-all censored BS.
Shortcut
Re: [vid666] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
vid666 wrote:
sorry, I disagree.

Empathy is 100% useless when it comes to incident discussion. It makes a person weaker and less logical. It cannot help the diseased, but can still help those of us who *may* make a similar mistake in the future.

Not wanting to hurt other persons feelings by not telling them that whatever they are doing is beyond their skill level may be a very nice and empathetic thing to do, but it is in fact a very wrong thing to do.

In my opinion desensitized discussion of BASE jumping is much better than a lallygagging please-all censored BS.

w00h00, bout fucking time! good post mate!
Shortcut
Re: [JBag] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
 
I wouldn't say that empathy is usless but it should not stand in the way of the discussion of the facts of the event. I how ever am still waiting for some one with dirrect knowlage of the event to post the relevent facts. That is what should be discussed here. Every thing else whether it be warm and fuzzy or biteing and antaganistic is just noise. I guess that includes this post as well. But hay, I'm board just like all the rest of you.

Lee
Shortcut
Re: [flydive] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
flydive wrote:
I used to think that the Incident forum was for "need to know the cold hard facts on every fatality so others may learn". As I've lost numerous friends over the years, I feel that the Incident forum needs a little more empathy and compassion for family and friends along with those facts, and much less finger-pointing. Shit happens... and it sucks.

I'm not trying to get away from the truth, just trying to get away from the fact-less "I wasn't there, but I know exactly what happened, and here's my irate opinion" ranting.

sigh... shaking my head...
now I've fallen into the same trap of helping take a very sad thread off topic... sorry Unsure
Shortcut
Re: [flydive] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
I have to agree with Richard. Let's get some facts before we make judgments. I'm all about learning from others' mistakes, but speculation and finger pointing don't help at all. Hindsight is 20/20, and everyone is an expert from their laptop, sitting at home. Hopefully we'll get some solid first-hand info at some point, and maybe even become safer jumpers as a result.
My respects to friends and family, we are sorry for your loss.
Shortcut
Re: [flydive] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
+1
Shortcut
Re: [JordanKilgore] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
and +2
Shortcut
Re: [Helmut] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
Helmut wrote:
Climbing down is often the best decision you will every make. My last two climbs we came down because of winds. We still have no idea what happened on this jump other than another one of us lost his life. This surprises me because there was someone with them.
I have a Chicken BASE Number myself...
Shortcut
Re: [flydive] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
In case anyone did not know, this was the 150th fatality on the list.
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
Bones,

Your assumptions are only serving to destroy your credibility. Like others have said, you weren't there and you don't know what happened.

I know both jumpers extremely well and also know facts about the jump, not assumptions, like the ones you've made from halfway across the country.

In reply to:
None of the local experienced jumpers were consulted or contacted by these two.

Locals were contacted. Im sure you'd like to think you know every jumper in the area, but you don't. You don't know me and I jump regularly.

In reply to:
The two jumpers chose to jump into a head wind from 246ft. Very few of the local jumpers had ever freefell this tower because it was not very beginner friendly to do so.

Wrong again. They didn't jump from the south side exit point. Also the jump was SL not freefall. As for the winds they were less than 5mph as measured on a Kestrel. If you take internet weather reports to heart than you might want to reevaluate some of your tactics.

Hey, we've all jumped the Perrine too but that doesn't make us experts on every fatality that has happened there. You might want to get your facts straight before you make yourself look like an ass.
Shortcut
Re: [skyjump4] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
skyjump4 wrote:
I know both jumpers extremely well and also know facts about the jump, not assumptions, like the ones you've made from halfway across the country.

skyjump4 wrote:
You might want to get your facts straight before you make yourself look like an ass.

if you wish people to discuss the actual facts about this case, feel free to share what you know. it sounds like you can end speculation, but rather not. maybe it is too soon, and things need to settle down.

Bones made valid points that should be considered by jumpers. many can learn from his comments, even if they were not applicable to this fatality. (fatalities have a way of opening jumper's minds and motivating them.)

this forum's intent is to save lives. withholding information, AND dampening speculation will also rob other jumpers of an opportunity to learn. every fatality is a tragedy, why not help others avoid the pain you now feel?
Shortcut
Re: [skyjump4] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
I never said I was there, nor did I pretend to be. All that I have tried to offer was what I know about the tower since I know a whole bunch about it, the weather conditions required to jump it, and the relative skill level required to attempt to go jump it.

You say "locals" I have said "experienced locals". There is a difference. A guy with a couple dozen jumps that were mostly day jumps from a legal bridge does not equate to experienced tower jumping mentor. So then tell me, who was the experienced tower jumping mentor contacted? If you think they were so qualified, feel free to rebut my statement with a name in private. Everyone I know to be 'experienced' and 'qualified' in mentoring tower jumps were not contacted. If the "local" was so experienced and qualified, tell me, why were they not there by Tyler's side to make sure things went well? Is that the kind of mentorship you expect from a teacher and friend? There are plenty of "locals" with less than 10 jumps, but would you call that contacting an experienced local for mentorship? If new base jumpers contacted me looking for a tower to learn on, I certainly would not have sent them to a sketchy tower on their own without some kind of accompaniment. I doubt anyone with real experience and a good head would.

Based on the knowledge I have of this site, I feel comfortable enough saying from the details given that the jump was made with poor judgment and decision making process. Anybody who would attempt to exit the east side of this tower demonstrates a poorer decisions making process than taking the south side into a head wind. And 'less than 5mph' from the south does not constitute strong north winds. The jump site requires strong north winds and more than half a moon on a clear night to jump, which was not the case. Since the tower was not far from the main road and extremely visible, sunrise jumping is also a bad idea (ethics wise).

I never claimed the jumper freefell this object, read what you quoted me on. Because even experienced jumpers rarely freefell it, it is safe to say that the tower was not a good place for new base jumpers to jump without their mentor aka 'not very beginner friendly'. Whether they chose to freefall it or s/l it, it is irrelevant. They still chose to jump it without the assistance of an experienced mentor and in the incorrect weather conditions. Good judgment and decision making process would have led to a climb down instead of "let's just static line the wrong side".

Again, this comes down to judgment and decision making process. In private, you told me that this incident was because "shit happens" and "base is dangerous". If you truly believe that the judgment and decision making process were irrelevant in contributing to this fatality and that this was simply a statistical anomaly, then you may as well add yourself to 'the list' now. Just because a deceased jumper was a friend does not mean one should fool themselves that they did nothing wrong. Everyone in this sport will lose more friends to poor decision making and bad judgment. Let's make up a scenario, if a recently graduated AFF student tells you, "I just bought a velocity 84 and I've got a friend with a C182, I'm going to go jump it and practice those hook turn thingies" would you argue that their upcoming fatality was due to poor decision making process and bad judgment? Or was it a statistical anomaly due to skydiving being simply dangerous?

There have been well over 1000 people read my original post urging new base jumpers to seek experienced mentorship in jumping towers after coming back from an fjc, do you think they were all experienced base jumpers? There are many skydivers who lurk this site looking to learn more about base.

Again, I'm terribly sorry you lost a close friend. I've lost my share as well. I know how it feels. When my friends have been killed due to making the wrong decisions, their friendship did not magically erase the mistakes they made that lead to their death. I use their story in hopes to try and keep further friends from making the same mistakes and I certainly don't get pissed at others who point out those mistakes, I know they're just trying to do the same no matter how bad I grieve. If you want to talk with me more about it, I welcome your phone call. It shouldn't be hard to get if you want it, just ask any local experienced base jumper.

Oh and I've never jumped the Perrine. Almost all my base experience are night time tower jumps. I don't even count legal ones.
Shortcut
Post deleted by epibase
 
Shortcut
Re: [epibase] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
epibase wrote:
Eric, 45 jumps in 2 years does not constitute jumping 'regularly'
I wouldnt even consider myself a local if I made that few jumps..

Simons credibility hasnt dropped any, but yours might have...

BSBD Tyler.. Unsure

Hmmm 45 in 2 years or 115 in 4 years, not much difference as a yearly average is there?
Thats if both profiles are up to date.
Not knocking either jumper but 6 jumps is only a good weekend or a wet weekend apart.
Shortcut
Re: [jools] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
115 illegal jumps in 4 years. I don't count BD, Europe, or Utah cliff jumps.

And I'm not claiming to be a VA local anymore. I am a former local still with the most experience off this particular tower. I spent two years not long ago being able to see it from my balcony. Even though DC and CB had experience with it before me, there are still those who refer to this as "Simon's tower" because I came to know it so well.

I have become a bit uncurrent in local base since I have been wrapped up in other projects since moving to TX 1.5 years ago, but when I do base, I stay closely in touch with those more experienced than myself.

Seriously though, Eric assumes I don't actually know who all Tyler talked to. There are plenty (PLENTY!) of details I will not post here on this public forum because I was not there and don't want to post second hand info from the dozens of people involved who blew up my phone and email the day of the incident. I would be happy to discuss these things in private, but I don't want to post things publicly that I don't know first hand, like conditions required for the tower. I'm only the guy that knows that tower best, not the guy that knew Tyler best. I only met him briefly once or twice.

BTW, the difference between having jumped the Perrine and this particular tower is that hundreds have jumped the Perrine a bunch. Only 2-3 people have ever freefallen this tower and even fewer know it inside and out, top to bottom like I do.
Shortcut
Re: [SimonBones] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
You know, the more I read, the more I think 90% of this dialogue should be moved to the "general base" forum (along with 90% of what I am saying now). Almost none of what you people are talking about has anything to do with what happened. It is starting to sound more and more like (forgive me for being blunt) a pissing contest to see who has the most experience and why. I know nothing about this tower and I didn't know the jumper, but may he rest in peace. This isn't about who knows about the tower or if you log illegal jumps. This is about someone dying and others learning from it. If you aren't willing to share the "pertinent" information you have, then why are you still posting on the subject? I don't mean any disrespect, but pretty much the entirety of your last post was autobiographical (i.e. all about you). Unsure
Shortcut
Re: [Rauk] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
I've noticed that many jumpers prefer questioning credibility than actually having a discussion. a real discussion requires an open mind. much of this stuff could be taken to PM's.

so, anyone want to get back to the fatality, ways to prevent additional incidents, etc.? healthy tower habits? etc.?
Shortcut
Re: [jools] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
I thought the purpose of this forum was to learn from others and prevent future mistakes.

If I have 2 or 200 jumps it doesn't really matter. I'm simply providing factual information about the event. Before my previous post the only thing on this thread was speculation.

Speculation isn't going to help anyone understand what happened or prevent a future mistake.
Shortcut
Re: [skyjump4] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
so I removed a post that was basically baiting.

baiting and chest thumping are really not helpful.

as I stated earlier, speculation can prove to be valuable. Bones posted some things that seem well thought ought. it's a shame that no one has posted better. even if the speculation proves wrong, in this case, it still might help save a life.

things to keep in mind:
- at least one person screwed up (maybe more)
- someone died
- many are now suffering
- not a great time for jokes

please just don't tear down. try instead to add. doesn't a fatality deserve our best?
Shortcut
Re: [skyjump4] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
skyjump4 wrote:
Speculation isn't going to help anyone understand what happened or prevent a future mistake.
Speculations on what actually happened won't help, but advice given based on them can. As someone with little knowledge about BASE, I'm happy I can actually read anything worth attention, and gain some invaluable knowledge for the future. I understand that such discussions can be hard to read for friends of those involved, but it is how it is, and you can't change it. Some tolerance from both sides of arguments won't hurt.
Shortcut
Re: Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
How about I just post some pics and data of the tower and you can decide for yourself if it is a good idea for an inexperienced jumper to jump it in south winds having never jumped to the tower before and not having assistance or guidance on hand from a mentor.

The tower is 246ft (75m) to the crows nest. It is a 3 legged underhung tower with outside climb.
Tower1.jpg
ViewFrom East.jpg
Shortcut
Post deleted by Treejumps
 
Shortcut
Re: [Treejumps] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
I could only speculate on those answers and I won't. There are photographs of the accident aftermath which have lead to some theories, but I don't think it's my place to discuss those publicly.
Shortcut
Re: [Treejumps] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
Treejumps wrote:
So what happened?

from the bits that come in through this thread, and a PM or two, it sounds like no one will ever know.

- 2 guys jumped
- the deceased was the "experienced" one, making the only eye witness is the "low time" jumper who hasn't said much, or couldn't process it.
- EMS came and cleaned up the scene.

it will take Sherlock Holmes picking apart various second hand stories to create a vision of the fatality. it still will be loaded with conjecture and speculation.
ShockedUnimpressed
Shortcut
Post deleted by Racha_Rodriguez
 
Shortcut
Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
I will be posting in the near future. Not only have I been ridiculously busy, but I have had to control an enormous amount of rage… not only from this and the LAST incident, but from the irony of things said in this thread. To prevent saying several things that will surely not bring me sunshine and lollypops… I have refrained from posting.

Each day I have refrained, I have also gotten a little bit more info.

I will post as soon as I am able to do so.
Shortcut
Re: [Racha_Rodriguez] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
I have received some information. not that much. not enough to be Sherlock myself. (Coco sounds like he might be willing.)

the key take away so far, is respect your abilities and ensure you address the object carefully. ensure you have more experience and guidance than you THINK you need.

if Coco says something different, go with him.
Shortcut
Re: [Racha_Rodriguez] Fatality in Suffolk, VA - July 16 2010
In reply to:
this tower looks to be fairly straight forward and simple with the right knowledge and experience.

You hit the nail right on the head Chris. The tower was just that, a bit more technical tower. Unfortunately, the right knowledge and experience wasn't there. To tower jumpers with the right knowledge and experience, the strategy is simple.

From this incident I would hope that any base jumper be reminded of the consequences of site naming and leaking local base sites to just anyone. You might give a benefit of the doubt to another charming and aspiring jumper that they won't go do something foolish with the knowledge you entrust them with, but then you'll have to live with knowing that you could have prevented their death by keeping your mouth shut and pointing them in the direction of further mentorship. We all know that not everyone will listen, and some people will try to find a way to crater in anyway, but just maybe the way you respond to a new base jumper will be what keeps them alive long enough to learn the err of their early over-eager ways.
I too was once an over-eager jumper as I assume most of you were, but time in the sport with the right people influencing you (or dying on you), will teach the lesson best phrased by a PM I received: "it has
definitely tempered my excitement a bit
and made me a more conservative jumper".

Nothing said here is anything new, it has all been written before:
In reply to:
Progress Slowly

It seems common sense to progress slowly in a sport as dangerous as BASE. After all, it is going to improve your safety. Nonetheless, it is worth pointing out. Especially when you are just beginning, it is easy to be so excited about this new sport, that you’ll be trying to jump as much as possible.

Mostly, this is a good thing. Getting a lot of experience in a short amount of time can be beneficial to a safe BASE career. Just make sure you don’t let your desire to jump cloud your judgement on the wind-conditions, technical level of the jump, and heat on the object.

Furthermore, since BASE is such a beautiful sport, do you really want to soak it all up in just a few months? Why not spread the great experiences over a longer period of time? In the meanwhile, just bang out lots of jumps on the easier and more accessible sites. Gain the experience to work your way up to more technical sites.

I urge aspiring or beginning base jumpers to read at least this:

http://www.basejumper.com/...Jump_Course_804.html

Stay Safe.
Shortcut
Updates
Bump.

I, and I'm sure many others, would like to know what actually happened?
Shortcut
Re: [soulbabel] Fatality 16 July 2010 Suffolk VA
http://insurancenewsnet.com/article.aspx?id=319575

In reply to:
Dec. 27--VIRGINIA BEACH -- The death of a Navy SEAL in an off-hours parachute accident last year occurred in the line of duty and was not due to misconduct, a Navy investigation found.
Petty Officer 1st Class Tyler Stimson died July 16, 2010, while parachuting off a cellphone tower in Suffolk. He was BASE jumping -- a high-risk, often illegal sport that involves parachuting from fixed objects.
Stimson, 30, was a member of Virginia Beach-based Naval Special Warfare Development Group, known informally as DEVGRU or SEAL Team 6. The unit attracted worldwide attention in May when it killed al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden in Pakistan.
Stimson's conduct did not rise to the level of recklessness or willful neglect, the commander of the unit wrote in his report, noting that he was engaging in an activity "closely resembling those which our operators engage in every day."
"To succeed, we must train hard and accept risks most others would refuse," he wrote. "Risk is inherent in our daily lives."
The investigation report was provided to The Virginian-Pilot last month in response to a Freedom of Information Act request. Names of the commanding officer and other principal players in the investigation were deleted.
The "line of duty" determination means that Stimson's dependents are eligible for military survivor's benefits, said Lt. Arlo Abrahamson, a Navy special warfare spokesman.
Stimson was married with no children.
Abrahamson said the determination was made in accordance with Navy legal standards. Under those standards, simple negligence, or carelessness, does not constitute misconduct, he said.
Stimson took numerous steps to mitigate the risk, the commander wrote. He was an experienced sky diver who donned the proper gear, attended training classes, consulted experts in the field and planned his jumps thoroughly.
Stimson was a combat veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan and a recipient of the Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal.
As many as 10 members of SEAL Team 6 have been known to engage in BASE jumping in their off-duty hours, the investigation found.

The acronym "BASE" stands for building, antenna, span and earth.
A fellow SEAL, Jason James Tompsett, 31, was with Stimson in the predawn incident and jumped off the tower successfully. He was charged with trespassing by Suffolk police. The charge was dismissed in Suffolk General District Court.
The 250-foot-tall tower off Godwin Boulevard is surrounded by a barbed-wire security fence with "no trespassing" signs on it.
"While I do not condone trespassing," Stimson's commanding officer wrote, "the trespassing did not proximately cause" Stimson's death.
In response to the accident, the commander wrote, the Navy initiated "a thorough review of high risk activities specifically concentrating on off duty recreational activities."
It remains unclear whether BASE jumping is an approved recreational activity for SEALs.
"We don't publicly discuss specific approved and disapproved training and recreational activities within our command," Abrahamson said by email, "but we can tell you any approved activity is carried out in a manner consistent with Navy safety instructions and in good judgment with regards to operational risk management."
Abrahamson did say trespassing is not tolerated. "We hold our service members accountable for their actions and expect them to abide by Navy instructions, community standards and all applicable laws," he said.
April Phillips, a spokeswoman for the Naval Safety Center in Norfolk, said there is no official Navy-wide policy regarding BASE jumping.
"But in many cases it's illegal," she said. "State and local laws would come into play."
Even if done legally, she added, a proper application of risk-management principles would indicate that "it may not be a good idea."
Stimson's jumping partner found him lying face-down on top of his canopy with its suspension lines wrapped around his feet. He died of multiple impact injuries to the head, neck and torso.
None of his equipment was found to be defective.
A Navy parachute specialist who examined Stimson's gear told investigators it appeared that Stimson rolled into a head-down position in which the lines became entangled in his legs, causing the canopy to engulf him. In such a short jump, he didn't have time to disentangle himself.
"BASE jumping is a very unforgiving sport," said Larry Pennington, owner and operator of Skydive Suffolk, a local sky diving center where Stimson was a regular jumper.

It's "an entirely different breed of cat" from sky diving, which is done from an aircraft at heights up to 13,000 feet, Pennington said.
A typical sky dive lasts 60 seconds, he said. In contrast, a typical BASE jump lasts two to six seconds.
"There's nothing wrong with a BASE jump as long as it's done properly and legally and is done with the proper gear," Pennington said. "If you don't adhere to the laws -- not only of the state, but of God and gravity -- they both have serious results."
Pennington said the only place he knows of in this part of the country where BASE jumping can be done legally is the 876-foot-tall New River Gorge Bridge in West Virginia, where jumpers are welcomed one day a year -- the third Saturday in October.
He tried it once about 25 years ago, "when I was a little bit younger and dumber," Pennington said. That was enough.
"Tyler was a good guy. He was a very safety-conscious guy. He just made a mistake," Pennington said. "You shouldn't think less of him. It was just what he wanted to do. Unfortunately he had some bad luck."
Shortcut
Re: [cpoxon] Fatality 16 July 2010 Suffolk VA
I rarely post anything on here but felt so strongly about this one i wanted to, i got online but you beat me to itWink
I was really happy to see that the NAVY did the right thing in this case. Reading the article it actually sounded like investigation came to a sensible conclusion, unlike the normal bs.
I still can't get over how many people posted comments about how tax dollars that will going to waste on his family benefits. Few soldiers can do what these guys day in and day out much less those of us who have never served.
Shortcut
Re: [Stut] Fatality 16 July 2010 Suffolk VA
haha bones is a d bagCool