Re: [Dorkzonehero] BAJ
I have to say this is prob one of your first posts I dont agree with.
Dorkzonehero wrote:
- Simpler system with fewer components means less chance of rigging errors.
Really? It's a PC. We have to switch them out all the time for different jumps so this would be no more rigging than a normal jump. What kind of errors are you talking about? It's either there or it's not. It's not fucking rocket science. Leaving if off would be the only potential error i see.
In reply to:
- Once canopy is pulled out, less disortion on the canopy gives better landings and better inflation.
OK, I'll give you that one, but in most cases it doesnt matter. I mean i know accuracy is important but if you are jumping something low enough to need a PCA then you're not going to have a whole lot of wiggle room for accuracy anyway. If you get a PCA and have time to do more than a 90 to land then you didnt need the PCA in the first place and need to HTFU and freefall it.
In reply to:
- Great trust excersise with the one giving the bridle assist
Very true, but people do get dropped. I dont think either party would consider this a good exercise if they killed their friend.
In reply to:
- If the jump is below 100ft you are fucked if your assistant fucks it up. Removing PC visualizes this and by doing so you actually improve safety.
If the jump is sub 100 ft then both parties need to have their games faces on no matter what. If someone needs a reminder then they have no business doing it in the first place.
In reply to:
- Its one more extraction method for your logbook
True, but since when did you start caring about that?
In reply to:
Its a pretty advanced teqnique, most FJC dont teach bridle assist. Nor do they teach funny alternatives to static line (condoms, electric tape, plastic bags). Its a damn shame.
I wouldnt call it advanced. I would call it intentionally ignoring an important piece of technology.
I'm all for experimenting and fucking around...but use the proper tool for the proper job.