Re: [Cal.B229] OSP VS FLik V-Tec
Cal.B229 wrote:
I have had a few jumps on a OSP 265 and am now jumping a FliK 266 VteC with HTS.
I find there is much more glide in the FliK and can cover more distance relitavly. It also sinks well on deep brakes, but takes more 'skill' to get it into a tight DZ than the OSP. The OSP feels much more forgiving when flying close to the stall point.
OSP was designed so to cover the areas were the approach need to be steep, were jumper deal with tight landing area. The canopy with good flight near stall point can NOT be at the same time the ultimate canopy for gliding. It is impossible to do so as aerodynamics are very precise science. Canopy with great glide always has much more sensitive stall point and sinks faster ( not at the beginning but after few seconds the vertical speed increase a lot ) I am not talking about the flare here. Flare is powerful as the horizontal speed transfers in to low vertical component. I am talking about the general characteristic of the BASE canopy w good glide being not that good at steep approach as vertical speed increase.
Good example are accuracy canopies as ParaFoil Classic , etc... it is easy to notice the tick profile and not so good glide sas the main characteristic of such canopies.
OSP is the canopy for ''urban jumping'', were the landings are tight and were there is no need to fly far to get the landing, were there is no high wind ( usually people aren't jumping in windy conditions )
OSP main characteristic is the fastest pressurization at opening in comparison to any BASE canopy on the market and very good steep approach characteristics ( very low vert. speed , very stable in deep brakes- does not slide - both are borrowed characteristics from accuracy canopies :) )
It is totally possible to use the OSP for slider up jumps too, without any problems, however, the main goal for OSP is slider down low objects type of jumps.
Troll DW with MDV or without are better choice for overall BASE canopy.