Re: [EduardoVincente] Primary Stow Question
EduardoVincente wrote:
but I have heard this "One for show, two to go".
There is a diversity of opinions on this topic.
I know very experienced jumpers (gear manufacturers, as well) who believe in no locking stow, others at the same level who believe in wrapping the locking stow as tight as possible, and everything in between.
The purpose of the locking stow is to stage the parachute inflation. It keeps the bottom of the canopy bundled tightly together as it travels to line stretch.
Leaving aside the folks who don't use it at all, there are two lines of reasoning here:
1) You want it to be as tight as reasonably possible to make it hold better.
2) You want it a bit looser to make sure it doesn't break prematurely (in the pack tray, while hiking out, or whatever) and cause you to lose any benefits of having it in the first place.
When I watch video of canopies opening (and believe me, I watch a stupid amount of that sort of video teaching), I can tell the difference between a canopy that is unconstrained (i.e. no locking stow) and one that is constrained (with locking stow). But I cannot tell the difference between a canopy with a tight or loose locking stow.
As a result, I tend toward #2, above, and wrap the rubber band loose, so that it is not unduly strained (and hence possible premature breakage).