Re: [434] BASE numbers vs years.
434 wrote:
out of 63 very experienced base jumpers attending KL 2002, and 38 most of the same as attending Shanghai China 2004.
There is 6 jumpers who is not with us any more. Those jumpers lost their lives in a very short period as well.
quite simple math, but also very sad statistic for our sport.
I think the statistic heavily depends on how the researcher defines "BASE Jumper." if all the newbies jumping at BD and in Idaho are included, it will dramatically water down the fatality rate.
the KL and Shanghai events tend to favor the most experienced jumpers. this includes many that will push the envelope. high jump rate + high risk level = higher fatality rate.
so the key is how to define a BASE Jumper. active? retired? one-and-done jumpers? those who've applied for a BASE number? only jumpers who jump xx times a year?
I expect that as you change that definition, you will watch the fatality rate change.