Basejumper.com - archive

General BASE

Shortcut
BASE numbers vs years.
Can someone help me.
I really want to know where the numbers between 710 and 730 intersect years wise. I am responding to a report.
Take care,
space
Shortcut
Post deleted by epibase
 
Shortcut
Re: [epibase] BASE numbers vs years.
Thanks.
Please read the report linked to in the link and the comments at the bottom.
http://observers.france24.com/en/content/20090825-base-jumping-first-requirement-insanity-wingsuit
Take care,
space
Shortcut
Re: [base283] BASE numbers vs years.
A couple of years ago I analyzed BFL data and came to conclusion that since late 80s the rate of fatalities remained about the same, 1:11 if you take the # of fatalities to date to highest BASE number to date. (about 1:10 as of now: highest BASE # is about 1350, fatalities - 134)
http://www.basejumper.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2291880#2291880

By running a poll, a ratio of total # of BASE jumpers to jumpers with BASE numbers was estimated as 1.4.
http://www.basejumper.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=2293473#2293473

So, at any time, 1 of approximately 15 BASE jumpers is dead.
Shortcut
Re: [base283] BASE numbers vs years.
Hey Space, come back to TX. for a visit.

PS
BASE 710 issued Dec. 01.
BASE 730 issued May 02.

Stay in touch.
Rick
Shortcut
Re: [yuri_base] BASE numbers vs years.
correction: by running a poll on a group of jumpers who use basejumper.com and respond to silly polls regarding base numbers, you came up with an estimated ratio of total # of base jumpers in the above group to jumpers with base numbers.
Shortcut
Re: [yuri_base] BASE numbers vs years.
so...
if all 450 people registered for any given Bridge Day actually attend, you'd expect 30 future fatalities amongst the group?

if that seems reasonable to you, maybe you ought to present your findings during the weekend?

p.s.
or you could ask Jason to poll jumpers if they visit this site regularly. you might get a different multiplier.
Shortcut
Re: [wwarped] BASE numbers vs years.
Here is another case!

out of 63 very experienced base jumpers attending KL 2002, and 38 most of the same as attending Shanghai China 2004.

There is 6 jumpers who is not with us any more. Those jumpers lost their lives in a very short period as well.

quite simple math, but also very sad statistic for our sport.
Shortcut
Re: [yuri_base] BASE numbers vs years.
In response to Yuri's post, I did an analysis a few years ago that agrees with 1 out 15 will die.
Shortcut
Re: [434] BASE numbers vs years.
434 wrote:
out of 63 very experienced base jumpers attending KL 2002, and 38 most of the same as attending Shanghai China 2004.

There is 6 jumpers who is not with us any more. Those jumpers lost their lives in a very short period as well.

quite simple math, but also very sad statistic for our sport.

I think the statistic heavily depends on how the researcher defines "BASE Jumper." if all the newbies jumping at BD and in Idaho are included, it will dramatically water down the fatality rate.

the KL and Shanghai events tend to favor the most experienced jumpers. this includes many that will push the envelope. high jump rate + high risk level = higher fatality rate.

so the key is how to define a BASE Jumper. active? retired? one-and-done jumpers? those who've applied for a BASE number? only jumpers who jump xx times a year?

I expect that as you change that definition, you will watch the fatality rate change.
Shortcut
Re: [460] 1 out 15 will die.
ten out of ten people die
how they die is a minor detail
how they live is more important
live it up friends, it's all there is to do
Shortcut
Re: [badenhop] 1 out 15 will die.
badenhop wrote:
ten out of ten people die
how they die is a minor detail
how they live is more important
live it up friends, it's all there is to do

SmileSmile
Shortcut
Re: [Ghetto] BASE numbers vs years.
I've been told that 87% of all statistics are right 53% (+/-3%) of the time, unless they are right 82% of the time. 46% (+/-3%) of all statistics fall in the latter category unless they don't, and in that case, it will have a 14.7% probability.
Shortcut
Re: [matt_f_001] fun with numbers
Funny thing to tell tandem passengers:
50% of the time, it works every time Cool
Shortcut
Re: [badenhop] 1 out 15 will die.
badenhop wrote:
ten out of ten people die
how they die is a minor detail
how they live is more important
live it up friends, it's all there is to do

Word.
Shortcut
Re: [badenhop] 1 out 15 will die.
Truer sentiments are rarely posted .
Shortcut
Re: [badenhop] 1 out 15 will die.
Badenhop, you're bad and you're right!! On your death bed, you won't have anything left but the Memories of your life. Might as well make some good ones.
Cliffleaper
Shortcut
Re: [badenhop] 1 out 15 will die.
badenhop wrote:
ten out of ten people die
how they die is a minor detail
how they live is more important
live it up friends, it's all there is to do

[Patron]Beer[/Patron]
Shortcut
Re: [RickHarrison] 1 out 15 will die.
what i'm going to say on my deathbed is 'ugg... uggg.... the treasure is buried over... ugg..'