Re: [SBCDave] Rok
SBCDave wrote:
straw man, nice! Do you have a degree Michael?
I do, but more importantly, I value sound reasoning. I've met loads of people with degrees who wouldn't know the difference between a sound argument and an unsound one, so I doubt it comes with the territory. There's plenty of unsound reasoning on the forums, and if I responded to all of it, I'd be a very busy man. In this case, though, I hate to see an accomplished BASE jumper give his head protection an "A" because he can imagine worse things to wear.
There's no point wearing head protection at all unless you think it's actually going to protect your head. If impact tests have been done with the Rok, I'd love to see them. Without those tests, given its construction and target market, I think there's reason to doubt its effectiveness.
Years ago, we had a similar discussion regarding Bonehead helmets, and eventually someone from Bonehead chimed in:
http://www.basejumper.com/...post=1645203#1645203 There are, potentially, good reasons to wear lighter head protection for BASE jumping: If comfort is a major factor for you, and you estimate the risk of major head trauma to be very low, you might reasonably wear a lighter helmet. However, my experience has been that many people who are wearing skydiving helmets are making the choice based on an inflated notion of the protection the helmet offers. That's simply tragic.
Michael