Re: [Treejumps] Imaginary interview with Sonic
Treejumps wrote:
Have we ever met? I can't say that I know who you are or if you are an active participant in the sport.
I don't see why that would matter. the quality of my argument should be based on logic, not provenance.
Treejumps wrote:
Why is it antagonism to question something like this that pertains to the sport?
it doesn't. unfortunately, you are NOT questioning. you are mocking, IMHO. that is a big difference.
Treejumps wrote:
People are concerned with the amount of videos that are out there. Those videos are not actively recruiting people into base for money.
but the videos are amping folks up. that jacked up audience appears to be Sonic's target market. thus, the people posting videos are
enabling Sonic.
or put it simpler... if there were no videos -> no Sonic.
once you accept the videos are available, it seems reasonable that someone would eventually try to serve that niche market. it just turned out to be Sonic.
Treejumps wrote:
Its hard for me to tell if you are defending Sonic or if you just like taking the opposite view on issues.
how about "I'd like to base my opinion on facts, not emotion?"
Treejumps wrote:
Do you think that someone with student status in base (11 jumps) should have anything to do with training people to base jump? Yes or no?
flawed question. most coaches in other sports NEVER were successful in their chosen activity. Bela Karolyi coached Nadia, Mary Lou, and others to tremendous success. I really doubt the man ever participated in WOMEN's gymnastics.
so I gave you an example of why I feel your question is flawed.
please provide an example where instructing/coaching is restricted to skilled particpants ONLY. (I really don't think most golf "pros" EVER played on the PGA tour...)
Treejumps wrote:
I believe that it is a very bad idea for the sport (as in keeping objects open for people to jump, injuries and fatalities), and bad for "students" to be spoon fed an entry into base. Its even worse to try to sell this business venture in the name of safety as in "this will make base safer", especially in light of the fact that the people behind it have nothing in the game. If you don't base jump, how can you be concerned with, or otherwise have any interest in the relative safety of the sport?
I agree with most of your comments, although I failed to see them in the mock interview.
most jumpers currently test their new gear while jumping an object. it seems entirely reasonable that being able to test a rig from a safer, more familiar environment enhances safety.
but the cost of that increase in safety may well mean more participation of marginal jumpers.
Treejumps wrote:
There are plenty of reputable gear builders and instructors. They all have significant base experience. That is exactly what prospective jumpers and the sport should expect and demand.
again, I agree, and I failed to see that point in the mock interview.
to build on an earlier post, I enjoy the encyclopedic gear knowledge that I have found when talking to Todd and Marty. (not to slight others). I intend on financially supporting them, or others of similar merit. it is my best interest to ensure they remain accessable.
unfortunately, too many americans let convenience outweigh quality. they choose companies that pander to them. they want to be lead by a guru.
if Sonic tells actual students that his class is the be all and end all regarding BASE, I'd be VERY skeptical. it sounds fraudulent.
if Sonic tells actual students that his course is only the first of a series that ought to be taken... well... he'd be right.
all I've heard about the course is marketing mumbo jumbo. I try to avoid getting too excited either way to course descriptions. I'm more concerned about the content than the packaging.
-----
now this is an example of having a
discussion. tell me where I'm wrong and why. I have no problem with that. the mocking of the original post seemed only to amuse those that already agree with you. (it can also cause those who disagree to remain silent.)
if you are right, I think it's far better to persuade others to agree with you. you might even prevent an injury or two.