Re: [base736] "Disposable" Camcorder
base736 wrote:
My understanding is that these things are generally uber-low resolution.
This one, for instance, seems to offer a whopping 263x152 pixels (ie, 152 lines). For comparison, NTSC is ~500 lines, and HD (though obviously nobody is expecting HD performance from a disposable camera) is ~1000.
That is indeed the camera I meant. The resolution is not great, especially if you go through CVS for processing. If you pull the recordings off it yourself (see above post) then it is possible to use that software to also tweak the recording settings. I believe you can set it as high as 640x480, the highest resolution that the camera can physically support. I think it also lets you change the maximum recording length, so if you turn up the resolution and turn down the length, the video quality will be pretty good.
Of course, that camera is nothing compared to professional or even amateur equipment. But the fact that it is cheap and relatively rugged (no moving parts) might make it work well as a body cam when jumping.