Re: [base283] Tib fib survivors
base283 wrote:
Is a broken ankle worse than a tib fib?
the general consensus is that the ankle fracture is worse
this is fairly well supported by the posts on here
I fragmented my Calcaneus in a snowboarding related incident that resulted in me taking a 30-40ft drop onto some rocks. (I also compression fractured 3 lumbar vertebrae and T12)
I did not get any surgery for the ankle and the reason for this was that the fragments were not displaced.
The fragments stayed together because I was wearing very hefty snowboard boots (Vans with the switch step-ins).
Had they moved, I would've gotten surgery and according to every orthopeadic surgeon I have seen my ankle would never have been very good again.
Now the boots I was wearing are far more supportive, heavy and impact absorbing than the Hanwags I jump with, but nonetheless, if you end up taking a big hit like that and your boots keep your ankle/foot pieces together, your prognosis is that much better.
Another thing I want to add is that rehabilition of ankle injuries is very important if you want most of that ankle's use back.
When my cast came off after 8 weeks, I couldn't put any weight at all on my ankle. Mobility was around 40% of normal for pronation/supination and 60% of normal for flexion/extension.
Through a LOT of intensive rehab, I got to about 95% of normal both ways after a year and I had also regained enough impact resistance that I could finally move at jogging pace.
I think it took me another 6 months to get to the point that I could run again.
I haven't heard of any tib/fib that required that amount of rehab.
I also met a street-luger who had a very similar Calcaneus injury, but he never took the rehab very seriously and a year after his injury his ankle hadn't improved very much at all.
So to everyone who is recovering from an injury: take your rehab seriously, you will be glad you did later!