Re: [syntax] gauging height of low objects
In reply to:
No dropping rocks either eh?
Here's the problem. Say you drop a rock. You dropped it vertically, right? If you lob it (maybe you have to clear some structure) enough to give it just a couple of extra inches above where you let it go, you'll add 1/10 second. Anyway, you record 3.3 seconds to impact. Maybe you're off by 1/10 of a second (if you're a ninja and you're using a stopwatch). If you went off of the sound of the rock hitting, you'll want to remember that sound will take 1/10 of a second to cover each 100 feet back to you. That can add up.
At 3.3 seconds, the rock is moving 105 ft/second. That means +/- 10 feet of error for every 1/10 of a second you're off. Altogether, maybe you're lucky and there's 2/10 of a second of error in your number. Is that significant? Could be if you were planning to freefall an object that you now know to be between 155 and 195 feet.
Laser rangefinders are cheap and give 1-yard accuracy. Rocks are even cheaper, but you probably shouldn't count on them to give better than 20 or 30 feet of accuracy even for a low jump. Rock drops only get worse from there.
Edit: Stupid typos...