Re: [hookitt] Just curious....
I think you are missing the point so I will explain more. Near drownings (inhaling water) can and has been fatal even though unconsciousness did not occur, The lungs can quit functioning on the victim hours after. Not to mention the induced pneumonia that accompanies it that they will get assuming they survive. One will dry, but one may not heal. It's not like in Hollywood where the babe is rescued from drowning and she makes love to her rescuer immediately after. Also your point is rather mute about the skilled boat drivers. They will extract the jumper whether he is alive or dead, quickly. "less than a minute" is a time you made up on the spot, you can't bs me on that one. Been there done that. Dead or unconscious jumpers don't fight you like a drowning jumper does and are therefore quicker to extract but it is still more than a minute. 3-5mn are more realistic.
And sorry but why did you compare a totally unrelated situation and then say it's not comparable. I don't get it. FG was a friend and he could swim.
Is this a "Straw man"?
"A straw man argument is a logical fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position. To "set up a straw man" or "set up a straw-man argument" is to create a position that is easy to refute, then attribute that position to the opponent. A straw-man argument can be a successful rhetorical technique (that is, it may succeed in persuading people) but it is in fact misleading, since the argument actually presented by the opponent has not been refuted."
If one can't swim, don't land in the water.
take care,
space