Re: [JaapSuter] Why does our gear work so well most of the time?
Yes, Jaap, you managed to voice that in an effective way and it's something we first noticed at early Bridge Days when the skill level and gear were nothing like today. We watched every mistake that's possible to make being done over and over, and people were getting away with it. Blown launches and out of control deployments? No problem . . . it made us think of the old saying about drunks and fools.
However, the sobering thought to keep in mind is this: If that was the New River Gorge Building, and not the New River Gorge Bridge, you'd need a mechanical industrial sized squeegee to scrape people off. Also, if there were no river the injury rate would skyrocket.
I remember one 1980s Bridge Day and being in a hotel room with the core of the hard core in BASE jumping, all the big guns of the time are there, and we are talking about this very thing. We wondered just how long we were going to keep getting away with it year after year. We talked about everything from making the event invitational only, to mandatory gear choices, to giving actual first BASE jump courses.
The year after Steve G. went in with a towed pilot chute we thought our luck was about to run out. The next year we wondered who was it going to be? Moe Viletto came back from walking down the long line of waiting jumpers and told me, "I saw him. He's about an hour away from launching, his helmet is cinched down tight, and he's about to bust a vein."
But it never came to pass and we realized we made a fundamental mistake about the future of BASE jumping. Sure, we knew we would be over run when a new generation without preconceived notions concerning BASE finally found us, but we thought a high level of carnage would also follow that wave. And it didn’t.
Of course ninety dead since 1981 is nothing to sneeze at, especially since so many are our friends. But the reality is what Jaap says it is. Sure, you're going to get hurt, and probably going to get hurt bad, but the chances of dying are nowhere near what seems logical.
But here's a warning. That's the state of things as they are now. Is the wave of new jumpers here now, or are we just seeing the tip of the iceberg? Do we have just one John Agnos per one thousand BASE jumpers and what will happen if someday in the future when have ten, or fifty or a hundred?
One side of me wants to take some credit for the current state of the sport rather than chalking it up to pure serendipity. I think we, all of us, did this, all of us who keep and pass on the history, all of us who build good gear, all of us who teach the sport by mentoring one jumper at a time. But, I also see how easy we could lose control of the whole bleeping thing.
How is that skydiving, which is way more regulated, seems more out of control to me than BASE jumping does? I think the answer is we aren't driven solely by profit and we use peer pressure more effectively. But there's something more to it than that. People drawn to BASE are a different breed of cat. I say this after knowing thousands of BASE jumpers; they are intelligent and curious without being overly reckless. Sure, we talk a good game, but even the most overzealous of us can be found off to the side looking over the gear for 10th time in as many minutes.
I stood in the lobby of the Holiday Inn for a few moments at Bridge Day, sort of off by myself, just watching people from all over the world laughing and packing and just being BASE jumpers, so cool and so competent. Bill Legg walked over and caught me smiling. "What's up," he asked, "what are you smiling about?" And while I think he expected me to say something more sinister or at least more smart ass, I looked him in the eye and said, "I'm just so proud of these people."
So yeah Jaap, I think we are doing all right . . .
NickD
BASE 194