Big walls vs Twin Falls
I know this has been discussed before but I couldn't find a good thread that focused directly on it (could be my bad search techniques). I've talked to several different people lately that are showing an interest in getting into BASE or just doing a single jump once in their life. These are all people with a lot of skydives (over 1K at least). I personally am in no position to mentor someone since I have under 50 jumps myself and have only jumped S & As but I do have my own opinion on what's the "safer" way to start. I notice that some jumpers with a lot more experience than me have a different opinion.
Personally, I always thought a legal span would be the best way to start. My reasons for thinking this are that the one legal span we have here is over water and has a nice big landing area. Plus it's a span, meaning there's nothing to hit if you have an off-heading. I'm not saying you can't get hurt there. We all know how dangerous this sport is. It just seems like a much safer environment.
After talking to some others recently though, I've noticed a good amount of more experienced jumpers say that the big walls in Norway are the best way to go to start. I can understand having more time to track and to clear any problems being good but I always considered having the wall next to you would be a lot more dangerous than having nothing next to you, even if you did have a lot more time to "fix" a problem.
Anyway, I was hoping to get a good friendly discussion going on this weighing the pros and cons of both. I have a lot of respect for you guys (most of you anyway

(Please note, I strongly urge anyone I talk to about it to take a FJC no matter where their first jump is along with reading Tom's "Getting into BASE", etc.)