Re: [jonege] Protest Jump in NPS
A few things . . .
Let's keep our eye on the fact that we are still very much in the planning stages. That said, when I suggested no one runs after landing I was thinking of the safety of both jumpers and Rangers. Law enforcement folks have built in control issues. When they lose control of a given situation they get frustrated, they get mad, and they make mistakes. All it would take is one cornered BASE jumper making a furtive move toward his waistband and a startled Ranger pulling his weapon and we could have a tragedy.
Also, by turning it into a free for all we will endanger the others who came in support. The last thing we need is Aunt Bessie swinging her handbag at a Ranger.
Another thing is the timetable and the actual plan itself. There are so many options available to us we really need to go through them all in order to be as effective as possible. I really think there is going to have to be a face to face meeting somewhere and at sometime to go through these. For instance, rather than a large jump from one place like El Cap we could mount a multi-pronged attack by putting 50 people off several NPS high profile sites all at the same time.
If we put any action off until next summer (yes, I know you're groaning) we could have this meeting at this year's Bridge Day.
We also need to reach out to jumpers not involved in the online BASE community and Bridge Day is our best bet for that. Something else that works in our favor is time. I think the NPS will get wind of this eventually and in a very small way, and something I'm not counting on, is the very possibility they might offer a "deal" to call it off. We are creating an opening here, and who knows how much light may eventually shine through it . . .
The following is something we'd need to discuss with Jason Bell, but I'd like to see some kind of peaceful protest at Bridge Day. Something that would not disrupt normal jumping. We are there, the public is there, and the Rangers are there. We also have the ear of the media and if every jumper interviewed refrained from talking about themselves, and instead raised the issue of unfair access in other parts of the NPS system, together with some serious sign carrying we could affect the message that emanates from Bridge Day. Do it like the government does, no matter what question they ask you just say what you want . . .
Again, anything organized like that needs Jason B's okay, as he manages Bridge Day for all jumpers, not just the ones who agree with direct action.
Lastly, the timetable and the real question of should we even do this needs to be knocked around a bit more. Just looking at the number here who raised points against this action is enough cause to be more thoughtful. I'm really beginning to see this as something not planned for this summer.
A few other points. One jumper up-board wondered why we can't make it work like it does in Europe. He mentions they (the jumpers) do a good jump of regulating who jumps and when. That's true, and we can do it too. However we started BASE jumping in U.S. National Parks from a more adverse position than you did. Your society wasn't so litigious, or afraid of celebrating a true human achievement, and there wasn't already a law against it on your books. We invented BASE ethics here and I know we can manage a program that works for us.
Tom A. is right, each in his own comfort zone. Either in the protest, or later on in a working program, otherwise qualified jumpers have the right to their own jump. No one should say no aerials. Every time we say no to something we give the other side ammunition to use against us. And we don't want to stifle progress. Something we tell someone not to do could be the beginning of the thing that unlocks our future. We also (in order to be successful) need acceptance from the NPS on our terms not theirs. We don’t need to put lipstick on a pig. BASE jumping is a good and noble thing for humans to do. I know in my heart there are enough people in the world who believe that to make it right. And right makes might . . .
On the "Feed the Children" or "Make a Wish" charity angle. It seems at first blush, like we are using the kids to get something we want. It's not like we are doing a Ten-K walk/race thing. But, I can change my mind, and this brings up this whole endeavor needs to be a group action. Of course there will be facilitators behind the scenes keeping the lists updated and the paperwork going, but no one is "in charge" Like BASE itself we are a loose band of brothers and sisters, but we are brothers and sisters tired of feeling like second class citizens in our own National Parks.
I had a nice phone conversation this morning, one of those calls I make to verify someone for the secret place, and this fellow says to me, "I don't know brother, I don't know if this is the right thing to do or not. But, it's time to saddle up . . ."
Early on in my BASE jumping I remember the criticisms we endured from people back at the drop zone. It reminds me of what I'm hearing know, except now even other BASE jumpers are chiming in. That's fine, and I understand their concerns. But I also know no one has ever given us anything in this sport. We have taken everything we enjoy. If you think that's not true because you (or someone) did the legwork to get a particular site legal, you're wrong. It was the blood, sweat, and tears of all that staked a claim in BASE, past, present, and future, that makes it possible. It is the "thing" that gives us credibility and we need to stay with the girl we brought to the dance.
(I'm sorry, I'm behind on the e-mails again, and for all the above at once. I'm in the middle of the last part of my radiation treatments - just five more to go - and I should start feeling better.)
"It's time to saddle up . . ."
NickD
BASE 194