Hetch Hetchey Number One . . .
Today's edition (4-5-05) of the Los Angeles Times ran two articles regarding Yosemite National Park. One dealt with the age old issue of removing the Hetch Hetchy Valley dam and the other is about building a climbing museum in Yosemite Valley. Both got me thinking . . . The other night, along with two visiting BASE jumpers (thanks, guys that was fun) we were discussing Yosemite Valley. The question is why is climbing not only condoned but encouraged when other uses aren't?
The newspaper article sites the historical importance of climbing in the Valley. But, who's it important to, just other climbers? I consider the 1966 jumps from El Capitan just as important historically as climbers consider their history. So is it just a numbers game? If there were tens of thousands of BASE jumpers in the world would that change things? Do people consider the slow erosion of cliff faces caused by climbing okay, just because so many people can relate to it?
I can answer my own question here – Golf is only televised because so many people play golf . . .
The NPS should be applying more of a fair use policy. And that policy should be based on what's good for the park. Would 100 BASE jumps from the lip of El Cap do more damage than one climbing attempt of its Nose route? There's a reason climbing parties call these attempts "an assault."
On another front the demolition of the O'Shaughnessy Dam would reveal what people have called Yosemite Valley's northern sister in Hetch Hetchy Valley. When built in the first part of the century John Muir called supporters of the dam idea, devils. Climbers are foaming at the mouth about a possible draining of this water. I guess my question is what makes climbing so sacred while BASE jumping is so demonized?
To me it seems BASE jumpers are subject to the powers that be solely on a whim that has nothing to do with fair use and environmental impact.
http://www.latimes.com/...oll=la-home-outdoors
NickD

BASE 194