Re: [subterminal] Consequences!
In reply to:
...some simply find it stupid while others think it’s quite cool to watch these jumps...
I think it's really a matter of personal choice. If you know, and accept, the extra risk, then you are making a choice. If, on the other hand, you are an inexperienced jumper who is doing it to be "cool" without really understanding the risks, I think that's not not so good.
I think that very many experienced jumpers have done things like this, or gone through stages where they were doing these kinds of things all the time.
I do understand the problems with setting an example, and they are large, but my opinion has been that most of the experienced people I see doing these types jumps are not doing them for the effect on the onlookers (i.e. they don't care if the jumpers watching think it's "cool", they are doing it for themselves). So long as you're not doing it specifically to impress newbies with how "cool" you are, I don't think you're going too far. You should still consider the site (and potential effects on other jumpers of the extra risks you are taking--so avoid access sensitive sites with these jumps).
I do not think that we can eliminate this type of jumping. Even if we could, eliminating it might fundamentally alter the feel of BASE jumping. This kind of risk taking is part and parcel of who we are and what we do. Would we, or BASE, be the same without it?
Without eliminating this, though, we can control it. That means we can do it in places where an accident will have minimal effect on other jumpers (i.e. the site will stay open), and in ways that will not encourage new jumpers (who may not fully understand all the risks) to emulate it.
I think that perhaps this is the reason that you sometimes appear to see very different reactions to this kind of thing, depending on the jumper, and the circumstances of the jump.
In this particular case, the cause for concern I see (on the above criteria) is that the two Swiss jumpers to have posted both expressed concern I wonder if this has to do with their concern for access issues in the area, and the effect an accident might have on them?