Basejumper.com - archive

General BASE

Shortcut
Cliff strike video
Here's the video of my cliff strike from a previous discussion: http://www.dropzone.com/...ost=1390780;#1390780

It was shown at the ABA video night last weekend so i've posted it on skydivingmovies.com for general consumption. Enjoy!

http://www.skydivingmovies.com/...ion=file&id=2138
Shortcut
Re: [jonathan_k] Cliff strike video
Couldn't find an answer to this one in the original discussion, so I'll ask it here.

You seem to go for toggles instead of risers. Was this a deliberate decision or a instictive reaction in the rush of the moment?

Consider the hypothetical situation where you had known in advance you would have had a 180. Would you have gone for risers, fly backwards and then turn it around, or would you still push yourself off the cliff to try and keep the canopy inflated as much as possible?

Great work on the coming out of it alive! Especially the part where your feet are pointing to the sky looks "interesting".

Thanks for sharing!

Jaap Suter
Shortcut
Re: [JaapSuter] Cliff strike video
Yeah, i went for toggles. That's what i was taught and felt comfortable with. I also think this has to do with the learning environment in Oz (others might not agree), where your first x number of jumps are sub-200ft PCA's, i had developed a riser response while skydiving but forgot about that on my first jumps as you've gotta be on toggles pretty quickly to land.

Saying that, i will definitely go for risers in the future. You can see in the video that i had a fair bit of horizontal distance to use, which i ate up by not responding appropriately (turning left first). I think if i left the brakes stowed and went for risers i would have had enough horizontal distance for the second response.
Shortcut
Re: [jonathan_k] Cliff strike video
I've jumped this canopy (it’s a Flik, well it was!!) and found it accelerated very quickly after opening. I put this down to the removal of the 5th control line, as is common in Australia, but without the necessary brake adjustment. This would have effected the response time required, basically putting the jumper into the cliff in less time. I’ve heard jumpers argue that sometimes forward speed in these situations is a good thing… ie: transferring forward speed into a turn, therefore creating a quicker turn etc.
Any ideas??
Shortcut
Re: [jonathan_k] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
You can see in the video that i had a fair bit of horizontal distance to use...

That was my initial thought. It looked like you had room to get the canopy close to a stall and turn it around in place at least 90 degrees on risers.

I hesitated to express that thought, because the sole fact that you came out of this unharmed makes you ten times the basejumper that I will ever be.

Again, nice work! It's great to see footage like this. It puts the scare back into me, yet knowing that nobody got hurt is nice.

Cheers,

Jaap
Shortcut
Re: [Dalai] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
but without the necessary brake adjustment. This would have affected the response time required, basically putting the jumper into the cliff in less time.

I'm not entirely sure I'm following. Was this a canopy with one factory brake-setting, two factory brake-settings of which the deeper one was used, or a customized brake-setting tailored to the jumper and brake-line length (with fifth control line mod)?

It's hard to tell how much forward surge (swing) you had on opening, because you pop the toggles, which always gives you a little more swing.

I think...

Jaap
Shortcut
Re: [jonathan_k] Cliff strike video
I was cringing watching that on Friday night! So glad you made it out ok!
Shortcut
Re: [jonathan_k] Cliff strike video
Is it me?
It looks like your turning to your left in freefall perhaps tip a shoulder while the chute is opening,causing your offheadding.
I would deafently recomend using rearrissers to avoid objectstrikes in that altitude,as you saw your toogles dint helped you much..

I wont blame you for not doing it as you already told you were taught to go for toogles,but you atleast had 1 oppertunety to get away from the walll whith rearrisers,even as things happens FAST as F*ck..

glad you made it Smile

Oh UK weather sucksUnimpressed
Shortcut
Re: [Faber] Cliff strike video
Glad you are still alive......that looked horrible

Is there anything else you can do after a strike to improve the odds a bit (Control Input).....or simply wait to slide onto a ledge?


Bit too wet for you today ehh Faber ???
Shortcut
Re: [Zoter] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
Glad you are still alive......that looked horrible

Is there anything else you can do after a strike to improve the odds a bit (Control Input).....or simply wait to slide onto a ledge?


Bit too wet for you today ehh Faber ???

After a strike there isn't much you can do. I tried taking a large portion of the impact with my legs as evident by the huge disfiguring scar real close to where it broke.

Dude real glad to hear you are still kickin'. Good luck on your recovery.
Shortcut
Re: [jonathan_k] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
...got on toggles straight away to turn right, couldn't feel my canopy turning after a couple of seconds and by that time had been rag-dolled around to the left and that looked like the better option, so i tried to turn left but was pretty much on the cliff and ended up flaring straight at it.....

While I have to agree that the risers are the best choice on this wall, it seems your toggle input was pretty non-responsive. When the Line-Mod is being used you'll get less response from your typical arm's length "stroke" than you would get if the lines were routed in the riser keepers as for slider-up jumping. Always keep this in mind and try to develop a steering technique for slider-down jumps that pushes deep and forward of your hips rather than the tendency to pull down and behind your hips as is the habit when skydiving. Also, having the toggles tied on a few inches higher than normal may help you get more tail down when you bottom out on the control stroke and it will help negate some of the effect that the Line-Mod has on the input.

Also, there's not many walls that will allow you to have a 180 & make an input one way, then change input and try another direction, even this highly overhung one -but I guess I'm not telling you anything you don't know now eh?? Laugh

In reply to:
Yeah, i went for toggles. That's what i was taught and felt comfortable with. I also think this has to do with the learning environment in Oz (others might not agree), where your first x number of jumps are sub-200ft PCA's, i had developed a riser response while skydiving but forgot about that on my first jumps as you've gotta be on toggles pretty quickly to land.

Don't take all advice as Gospel. Question evrything you are taught and understand the reasons for evrything you chose to do. Don't just go for the toggles 'cause someone told you to. Think WHY you are making particular choices (eg. toggles, risers, two-way, longer delay). Make your choices after assessing everything. Each site is different and needs to be assessed all the way to the ground. Even the same site can have different requisites and possible outcomes on different days or situations (weather, multiple jumpers, light, etc). Ultimately, we have to think it thru for ourselves.

Glad ur ok! Take care mate!

Wink


g.
BASE985
Shortcut
Re: [jonathan_k] Cliff strike video
Lucky SOAB! Actually it's beyond luck!

It looks slider removed. What size PC?
Shortcut
Re: [jonathan_k] Cliff strike video
In case of imminent strike, use the risers. Otherwise use the toggles. At least you didn't burn up tons of altitude flying on risers. Dwain W. once commented about doing super low freefalls. He wouldn't unstow his toggles for landing since he would get an opening surge that could cause a problem. It is possible to land on rear risers even with toggles stowed - prohibited by the type of landing area of course. I believe he would grab the brake line immediately above the keeper ring and fly on this.
Shortcut
Re: [460] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
In case of imminent strike, use the risers. Otherwise use the toggles

Why...?
Or rather.... whats the advantage of this methodology over just using risers to turn yourself away from a 'non' imminent strike?
I'm not being argumentative......I just dont know
Shortcut
Re: [Zoter] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
In reply to:
In case of imminent strike, use the risers. Otherwise use the toggles

Why...?
Or rather.... whats the advantage of this methodology over just using risers to turn yourself away from a 'non' imminent strike?

To simplify:

Toggle turns use more forward space. Riser turns use more altitude.

When making avoidance decisions, be aware of what your biggest danger is. If it's hitting the object, generally, you'll want to sacrifice altitude to avoid object strike (hence, use the risers). If it's not, then the next danger coming up is the canopy flight to landing, so you'll want to use toggles to conserve altitude.

This is pretty much the same reasoning that tells us to use risers to avoid strike _only until no longer facing the object_, and then switch to toggles. There's no need to turn the full 180 on risers (and you'll spend way too much altitude if you do so). You just want to use the risers to avoid the strike, then once strike is no longer an immediate danger, move to toggles.

That wasn't very clear, was it? Sorry. I'll try to clean it up and explain better if you want.
Shortcut
Re: [nicknitro71] Cliff strike video
dont say its luck... I got chewed out on another post for saying "lucky shite"
Shortcut
Re: [eb66to77] Cliff strike video
[replyAfter a strike there isn't much you can do. I tried taking a large portion of the impact with my legs as evident by the huge disfiguring scar real close to where it broke.
While I agree with the general sentiment (that after striking, you're often just along for the ride), I do think that in many strikes, the jumpers post-strike responses are very important.

People who have experience with things like high speed cliff rappels and climbing falls are, in my relatively limited experience, far better able to deal with the "bouncing off" part of a cliff strike.

The most important thing you can do, of course, is to keep fighting all the way to the ground. Nothing will kill you faster than giving up.
Shortcut
Re: [TomAiello] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
That wasn't very clear, was it? Sorry. I'll try to clean it up and explain better if you want.
No no ...thats clear enough , thanks
Rather than change grips to 'go to toggles' on a 180 where the object has been avoided through rear riser input.........is it not better to just ease off the amount of rear riser input and still continue the turn until the desired heading is reached....
Or is the altitude loss between riser/toggle turn that different?
Shortcut
Re: [Zoter] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
Rather than change grips to 'go to toggles' on a 180 where the object has been avoided through rear riser input.........is it not better to just ease off the amount of rear riser input and still continue the turn until the desired heading is reached....
Or is the altitude loss between riser/toggle turn that different?

In my opinion, it's really that different.

If I have clear air in front of me, I'll let the risers up and pop the toggles.
Shortcut
Re: [jonathan_k] Cliff strike video
This may be a little off subject here, but how in the hell did you get off that ledge? I'm glad everything turned out alright.
Shortcut
Re: [tommyh] Cliff strike video
From an older thread:

In reply to:
Yeah i climbed down about 50 feet then there was another 50 feet of unclimbable rock down to a ledge that was accessible from the landing area. I sat there for 3 hours while the guy i was jumping with organised some ropes and stuff to get down with (thanks ben!). I was stuck on the face for 4 1/2 hours all up. It ended up being quite fun, after a failed attempt to throw up a rock with some fishing line tied to it, i had to make a rope out of my clothes which came up short, so i made the rest with some bark from a small shrub on the ledge i was on. How not to BASE jump macguyver style...

Cheers,

Jaap
Shortcut
Re: [tommyh] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
...how in the hell did you get off that ledge?

Some paragliding pilots fly with a roll of dental floss in their harness. That way if they ever land in a tree they can lower the dental floss down to the ground, have someone tie a rope to the end and then they can pull up the rope. Dental floss is light and pretty strong and it is easy to carry 50 yards of it in your pocket.

Any BASE jumpers carry this with them?
Shortcut
Re: [pBASEtobe] Cliff strike video
this is an outstanding idea. I will now include this in my waist bag (fanny pack) of tools.

So far, In mine, I include
extra tailgates, diff sized rubber bands, pullup cords, knife, wind meter, closing loops, a small bunch of break cord. 2 links with 2 ft of cord already tied, a small flashlight, gloves unless worn, lighter, DV cable, and a radio if needed for the jump.

believe it or not, this is a "normal" sized waist bag.

What else might I include? I already take a basic load of First Aid equipment for "small" injuries.

Maybe Tom can break this off into a different thread?
Shortcut
Re: [TomAiello] Cliff strike video
Excellent point Tom.

Some of the early jumper commented that whenever their shoes stuck to the wall more than just a moment, the ankles and legs would start breaking and shattering. Friction seems to be an interesting culprit, but I'm just hypothesizing.
Shortcut
Re: [leroydb] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
extra tailgates, diff sized rubber bands, pullup cords, knife, wind meter, closing loops, a small bunch of break cord. 2 links with 2 ft of cord already tied, a small flashlight, gloves unless worn, lighter, DV cable, and a radio if needed for the jump.

Lockpicks? Black ski mask? Crossbow?
Shortcut
Re: [LouYoung] Cliff strike video
can't tell all my secrets... just kidding.. most lockpicking i know is using a jimi to open a car door...

ski mask... I have a hoody I wear...

I have other talents though... I won't tell either, nothing to prove to anyone. The less people know that I know, the more of an upperhand (maybe advantage is a better word) I have...
Then again... maybe I am just saying this to lead...
Shortcut
Re: [jonathan_k] Cliff strike video
Thanks for posting that, it looks like you could have gone right or left to me. Unsure

Did you also loop back through your risers too ?
Shortcut
Re: [460] Cliff strike video
Shortcut
Re: [Dalai] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
Or you can pop your brakes and instantly continue into half brakes (basically using up the line that has been released), then sink it in and flare from half brakes. Resulting in minimal surge and a flare. Common when free falling the sub 200" "S" that was talked about earlier in this thread.

It's probably better to pop the toggles to a point well past half brakes. From deep brakes to half brakes will still cause a surge. You ought to be bringing the toggles to the same point as the brakes held them (i.e. to deep brakes), to avoid the surging (into the ground, object, etc). Then let up slowly and flare from where ever the toggles are when you get to the ground.
Shortcut
Re: [TomAiello] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
It's probably better to pop the toggles to a point well past half brakes. From deep brakes to half brakes will still cause a surge. You ought to be bringing the toggles to the same point as the brakes held them (i.e. to deep brakes), to avoid the surging (into the ground, object, etc). Then let up slowly and flare from where ever the toggles are when you get to the ground.

That's the exact method Dwain explained to me when we talked about it.
Shortcut
Re: [Zoter] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
Bit too wet for you today ehh Faber ???
i hates UK weaterMad but hey it looks good for the weekendTongue
Shortcut
Re: [TomAiello] Cliff strike video
When doing low FF’s and PCA’s I always use a slightly shallower brake setting. This enables the canopy to open flying instantly and minimises any surging when the brakes are blown. It also results in a better flare on rear risers if necessary. The setting I use is not so shallow it results in dangerous amounts of speed on opening, just shallow enough. Jason F did a large number of PCA’s from a 140ft tower playing around with brake settings and this was what he found worked best for him.

In regards to the general toggles vs. risers debate, it’s important to consider what brake setting you are using. When brakes are stowed at the deeper end of the spectrum a canopy will open with minimal forward speed however noticeably more height will be lost with riser turns. If a slightly shallower setting is used the response to riser input will be better however speed on opening will be a little more resulting in slightly less time to react.

Liv
Shortcut
Re: [TomAiello] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
To simplify:

Toggle turns use more forward space.
Not true.
Tom A, if thats what you believe then youre doing it wrong.
Meaning you dont have adequate skill and techniques to be most effective with your toggles.
It is also possible you dont have your toggles set up and prepared correctly.





I wrote an article on the subject of Risers or Toggles hoping to shed some light on this subject. The article can be found in the Info Library section of my website.
Shortcut
Re: [jonathan_k] Cliff strike video
from jonathans account:
In reply to:
...got on toggles straight away to turn right, couldn't feel my canopy turning after a couple of seconds and by that time had been rag-dolled around to the left and that looked like the better option, so i tried to turn left but was pretty much on the cliff and ended up flaring straight at it.....
In reply to:
Yeah, i went for toggles. That's what i was taught and felt comfortable with. I also think this has to do with the learning environment in Oz (others might not agree), where your first x number of jumps are sub-200ft PCA's, i had developed a riser response while skydiving but forgot about that on my first jumps as you've gotta be on toggles pretty quickly to land.

Saying that, i will definitely go for risers in the future. You can see in the video that i had a fair bit of horizontal distance to use, which i ate up by not responding appropriately (turning left first). I think if i left the brakes stowed and went for risers i would have had enough horizontal distance for the second response.

Jonathan,
Glad youre ok.
It looked and sounded to me like you got your hands in the toggles fairly quick and had about 3 seconds between you and the cliff. More than enough time to turn the canopy with the toggles.

What you need to figure out is why you could not turn the canopy with the toggles. The first 4 possibilities that come to mind:
1. Did you make sure to release the brake setting on both sides?
2. Did you put the other toggle up to a full flight position while pulling the toggle of the side you wanted to turn to all the way down?
3. Were your toggle settings dialed-in for a slider down/off (LRM) jump?
4. Were you using an effective technique of steering the canopy with the toggles while using the LRM (line release mod)?


You may find the Risers or Toggles article I mention in my previous post interesting.


Hope this helps
Shortcut
Re: [JohnnyUtah] Cliff strike video
Johnny,

I found it interesting that in your article you cite Dwain as an authority supporting your position, based on a conversation you had with him in 1999.

On November 8th, 2001, Dwain posted (in his own words) the following post on BLiNC with the heading "Avoiding Object Strike (long vers)":

In reply to:
OK, this has saved my ass on about 4 occurrences with Mojo's:

180 offheading - flying at wall - very close to impact. No time to turn away. Hard input on both rear risers. Canopy stalls backwards. Let up on left rear riser (while still pulling down on right). Canopy barely turns - cells are barely pressurized and there are waves going through the canopy. Reach across with left hand and pull down on front right riser (while still pulling down on right rear riser). This forces air into the cells - canopy instantly response and spins on the spot. Immediately let up on riser input and release brakes to drive away from the wall.

My importance list for avoiding a wall strike:

1. 180’s happen to all of us eventually. Do every thing you can to minimize the occurrence but resign yourself to the fact that they will happen. (Note: see the definition of Murphy’s Law).

2. Avoid smacking the wall at ALL costs.
Get the canopy to open with absolute MINIMAL forward speed. Forget all that sh*t about needing forward speed to get the canopy to respond to riser input. There is zero point to having a responsive canopy if you don't have the time to turn it away. Also the faster the forward speed of your canopy on deployment the harder you will hit the wall and the more bones will snap.
SLOWER forward speed is BETTER in 99% of serious offheadings close to the wall. Anyone who tells you otherwise has not had to deal with a bona fida 180, half line twists on a go-n-throw from a vertical wall. Factory installed brake settings on Mojo's are dangerous, dangerous, dangerous - even for the fastest BASE jumper in the world. Yeah - they work great for rear riser input on a 135 offheading, but turn it into a 160-180 offheading and the wall comes at you like a freight train. (Note: Adam does strongly recommend customizing your brake settings as the factory settings are extremely conservative. This is more of an issue with Mojo's than with FOX's due to the steep angle of attack on the Mojo).

3. Turn the canopy away from the wall.
In dealing with point #2 you have installed customized brake settings on your canopy (but not so deep that you risk a stall). Now because the canopy is going so slow you suddenly have response issues to rear riser input. Basically the thing won't want to turn and will probably stall if you pull down too hard on a rear riser.
The answer to this is not: make the canopy fly faster forward (read point #2 again). The answer is do something else to make the canopy turn away. Some people say "toggles". Well toggles are great (and my personal preference) if you aren't really close to the wall and flying directly at it. There are situations (eg. go-n-throw from vertical wall, bona fida 180 with half a line twist) where you do not have time to use toggles (I am NOT talking about the extra time to grab the toggles, I am talking about the response lag between releasing the brakes, pulling down on the toggle and the canopy actually responding). Also you may be so close to the wall that as you are turning away the end cell will drag on the wall and swing you back in. (I have seen this type of wall strike many times - and subsequently dealt many times with the resulting helicopter rescue, police, media, blah blah blah). If you are about to smack a wall nose on, the only thing to do is to back the canopy away far enough so that when you turn it, the end cell won't clip the wall. Flying the canopy backwards is the only option here (unless you are so low that you will pound into a ledge or the ground as you turn - in that case you just have to sink the canopy straight down and PLF - good luck).
In order to turn the canopy away the combination of both front and rear riser (with the brakes set) works really well. The canopy response almost instantly and just spins on the spot. Front riser input alone is a BAD idea as it makes the canopy dive forward and turn in an arc.

Note: In my experiences with the Vtec (and limited experience with the Blackjack) you usually don't need the front riser input as the vents keep the cells pressurized in almost zero forward speed and the canopy response great to rear riser input alone.

When to go for toggles and when to go for risers?
Basically here is my personal rule for that: If I open and I am flying at a wall and my body starts tensing up for immanent impact then I go for risers, otherwise I tend to go for toggles.
“Oh sh*t, whimper" on opening = risers.
"Uh Oh, I'm looking at wall" = toggles.

4. You aren’t good enough with the technology you are using to always avoid object strike.
With the current technology on the market NOBODY is good enough to avoid a wall strike every time. I have dealt with bad 180's close to the wall (sometimes with serious line twists) on many occasions (actually the number of times I have had 180's is downright embarrassing). I have never had my canopy touch the wall yet (I've pushed of the wall with my feet twice), but I am NOT stupid enough to think that I am good enough to deal with it every time.
Object strike is the number one incident that injuries highly experienced BASE jumpers when they haven't made a gross error of judgment. By plugging out thousands of BASE jumps we are playing a numbers game (if you jump vertical walls slider down). Statistics say that eventually you will hit the wall (Slim hit the wall three times in 1270 BASE jumps. Jump #1270 was the one that really f####d him up (but he's healing well and should be jumping next year). He probably has done the most slider down canopy deployments of anyone in the world and he is ULTRA FAST in dealing with offheadings). As the technology we are using advances (such as bottom skin vents, big grab toggles, vented pilot chutes) the odds are increased in our favor. All we can hope is that the technology increases at a faster rate than the numbers game we are playing.

Hope this helps.

I think the bottom line statement is probably this:
In reply to:
When to go for toggles and when to go for risers?
Basically here is my personal rule for that: If I open and I am flying at a wall and my body starts tensing up for imminent impact then I go for risers, otherwise I tend to go for toggles.
(emphasis added)

I am curious how you reconcile this conflict between what you said his position was, and what he stated as his position.

Can you clarify?

Thanks!
Shortcut
Re: [TomAiello] Cliff strike video
General statement to all readers:
Because it takes time and training to gain the proper skill to be using toggles as Plan A, I am not recommending toggles over risers or visa versa. Even though I am a toggle guy, I still think using risers is a suitable method of dealing with an off-heading opening. I dont really go for the whole Toggles VS Risers debate. Thats why I called my article Risers or Toggles. It is what it is.
I am pro-toggles and pro-risers.....get the job done!!!
Having said that, I do have a personal preference, which I have expressed clearly with reasons and cautions.


In reply to:
I am curious how you reconcile this conflict between what you said his position was, and what he stated as his position.
Can you clarify?
Sure. No problem.

In reply to:
Johnny,

I found it interesting that in your article you cite Dwain as an authority supporting your position, based on a conversation you had with him in 1999.
I didnt cite Dwain as an authority supporting my position. I cited him as a BASE jumper agreeing that he should have gone for his toggles. Im pretty sure he felt that way because he almost got seriously injured or killed from the sink caused by using the risers.


I said this in this thread a while back (Oct 2003):
In reply to:
Dwain and I are on the same page, like we were on most things we discussed. I can think of a time when we disagreed on an issue. It was at the last Petronas event, concerning a jumper who spiraled onto the roof of the mall. After watching the video one time, I said it looked like he had a tension knot. Both Dwain and Slim adamantly disagreed with me. They thought because the slider had come down, it could not be a tension knot. I listen to their response, and quickly determined that a tension knot can occur within a single risers line set. After explaining this to them, they still disagreed. Later that day, a zoomed in photograph, taken from another building, showed without a doubt, that it was indeed what I said it was (a tension knot).

Tom, I also said this to you in that same thread:
In reply to:
This reminds me of something you said at Petronas last December. You were saying that a line over will not make your canopy spiral. I over heard this and thought for the safety of you and others, I should inquire. I asked you why you would think that. You said because you had a line over and it did not spiral. I told you then, Every line over has a different configuration. I hope you believe that.
I really do hope you understand the reality of what I was telling you there.


In Dwains post that you quoted, I agree with much of what he is saying, but not everything.
For example: I agree that this part describes an excellent technique if you are using the risers.
In reply to:
180 offheading - flying at wall - very close to impact. No time to turn away. Hard input on both rear risers. Canopy stalls backwards. Let up on left rear riser (while still pulling down on right). Canopy barely turns - cells are barely pressurized and there are waves going through the canopy. Reach across with left hand and pull down on front right riser (while still pulling down on right rear riser). This forces air into the cells - canopy instantly response and spins on the spot. Immediately let up on riser input and release brakes to drive away from the wall.
What I would do in a similar situation is this:
I would go for my toggles and pull them all the way down immediately. This will stop the canopy. From there I can do a snap turn by letting one of the toggles all the way up or I can fly backwards first if I feel I need to and do the snap turn at any time I choose. You can stop and fly backwards just as effectively with the toggles as you can with the risers. By using the toggles you can snap turn on a dime better than you can with risers (this is a main reason I am a toggle guy), plus you dont have to change grips like you would during the riser maneuver. Using the risers will cause you to sink drastically. On the other hand, using the toggles will result in minimal altitude loss (this is another main reason I am a toggle guy).


I also agree with this statement of his:
In reply to:
SLOWER forward speed is BETTER in 99% of serious offheadings close to the wall. Anyone who tells you otherwise has not had to deal with a bona fida 180, half line twists on a go-n-throw from a vertical wall.
I have been in a similar to worse situation.
I used the toggles to save myself. If I had used the risers, I would have had an object strike.


In reply to:
Some people say "toggles". Well toggles are great (and my personal preference) if you aren't really close to the wall and flying directly at it.
I prefer to have my toggles in all situations (except when I have to reach above line-twist).


In reply to:
There are situations (eg. go-n-throw from vertical wall, bona fida 180 with half a line twist) where you do not have time to use toggles (I am NOT talking about the extra time to grab the toggles, I am talking about the response lag between releasing the brakes, pulling down on the toggle and the canopy actually responding).
I disagree with this statement of Dwains. By using practiced technique, I can make the canopy respond considerably faster (time and distance) by using the toggles.


In reply to:
Also you may be so close to the wall that as you are turning away the end cell will drag on the wall and swing you back in.

If you are about to smack a wall nose on, the only thing to do is to back the canopy away far enough so that when you turn it, the end cell won't clip the wall. Flying the canopy backwards is the only option here (unless you are so low that you will pound into a ledge or the ground as you turn - in that case you just have to sink the canopy straight down and PLF - good luck).
I agree, but I want to mention again that you can back out of such a situation by using the toggles like I described above.

Also, (a quote from my article):
>>Keep in mind, when you are flying backwards, you are in a complete stall.  That is why I think flying backwards to get out of a tight spot on a low object is a risky endeavor.  If it came down to having to ride the ball to the ground, I would MUCH rather do that on toggles.<<


In reply to:
When to go for toggles and when to go for risers?
Basically here is my personal rule for that: If I open and I am flying at a wall and my body starts tensing up for immanent impact then I go for risers, otherwise I tend to go for toggles.
“Oh sh*t, whimper" on opening = risers.
"Uh Oh, I'm looking at wall" = toggles.
If you are super fast on the toggles, through muscle memory you will have your hands going in the toggles as you are realizing your situation. There is no deciding what should I go for, you are already there (or nearly there).
That way when you need to take action, it can be instant.


If you noticed, Dwain mentions a couple things to the effect that a less than ideal brake setting -or- an ideal brake setting, can cause inadequate results while using the risers. If you are using the toggles, then once you pull the steering lines down past the brake setting point, the brake setting that was, is no longer an issue.
In reply to:
Yeah - they(conservative brake settings) work great for rear riser input on a 135 offheading, but turn it into a 160-180 offheading and the wall comes at you like a freight train.

In dealing with point #2 you have installed customized brake settings on your canopy (but not so deep that you risk a stall). Now because the canopy is going so slow you suddenly have response issues to rear riser input. Basically the thing won't want to turn and will probably stall if you pull down too hard on a rear riser.



In this context, if you would like to read my thoughts on the subject of risers or toggles, it is here.

Hope this helps.
Shortcut
Re: [TomAiello] Cliff strike video
Hey Tom,
What I'd really like to see are these techniques in action. (Risers and Toggles) Having someone shoot video from the top, of both techniques with the same canopy. If I lived closer to the bridge I would do it myself. I used to be a toggle grabber but I had a object strike trying to avoid a underhung antenna in zero wind using toggles. (Not using the technique Johnny has explained) Now I'm training myself to go for risers.
Shortcut
Re: [DaveO] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
What I'd really like to see are these techniques in action. (Risers and Toggles) Having someone shoot video from the top, of both techniques with the same canopy. If I lived closer to the bridge I would do it myself.

Another possibility is to do both techniques, as well as Dwain's front/rear riser turn, with a Pro-Trac or Neptune and then compare the graphs. I'd think you could get some interesting data on both vertical altitude loss and forward speed.
Shortcut
Re: [Zennie] Cliff strike video
I think GPS might be a better instrument for that.
Shortcut
Re: [TomAiello] Cliff strike video
set up a camera on the edge of a bridge facing straight down. jump off facing the bridge.. try the 2 methods of turning as soon as canopy opens. see which method puts you more under the bridge.. you wont be able to get opening locations the same but you should be able to see the difference on camera. maybe another person filming from the ground to get the canopy sink aswell. now all you would need is someone who lives close to a nice height bridge =)

Wink
Shortcut
Re: [Maxim] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
set up a camera on the edge of a bridge facing straight down. jump off facing the bridge.. try the 2 methods of turning as soon as canopy opens. see which method puts you more under the bridge..

I've done this dozens of times. I've also made many of my students do it. Since it's already been done, I doubt that it's going to provide any acceptable evidence for this discussion.
Shortcut
Re: [Zennie] Cliff strike video
In reply to:
Another possibility is to do both techniques, as well as Dwain's front/rear riser turn
hmm i never considdered that...

need to be practiced through...