Re: [TomAiello] Cliff strike video
General statement to all readers:
Because it takes time and training to gain the proper skill to be using toggles as Plan A, I am not recommending toggles over risers or visa versa. Even though I am a toggle guy, I still think using risers is a suitable method of dealing with an off-heading opening. I dont really go for the whole Toggles VS Risers debate. Thats why I called my article Risers or Toggles. It is what it is.
I am pro-toggles and pro-risers.....get the job done!!!
Having said that, I do have a personal preference, which I have expressed clearly with reasons and cautions.
In reply to:
I am curious how you reconcile this conflict between what you said his position was, and what he stated as his position.
Can you clarify?
Sure. No problem.
In reply to:
Johnny,
I found it interesting that in your article you cite Dwain as an authority supporting your position, based on a conversation you had with him in 1999.
I didnt cite Dwain as an authority supporting my position. I cited him as a BASE jumper agreeing that he should have gone for his toggles. Im pretty sure he felt that way because he almost got seriously injured or killed from the sink caused by using the risers.
I said this in
this thread a while back (Oct 2003):
In reply to:
Dwain and I are on the same page, like we were on most things we discussed. I can think of a time when we disagreed on an issue. It was at the last Petronas event, concerning a jumper who spiraled onto the roof of the mall. After watching the video one time, I said it looked like he had a tension knot. Both Dwain and Slim adamantly disagreed with me. They thought because the slider had come down, it could not be a tension knot. I listen to their response, and quickly determined that a tension knot can occur within a single risers line set. After explaining this to them, they still disagreed. Later that day, a zoomed in photograph, taken from another building, showed without a doubt, that it was indeed what I said it was (a tension knot).
Tom, I also said this to you in that
same thread:
In reply to:
This reminds me of something you said at Petronas last December. You were saying that a line over will not make your canopy spiral. I over heard this and thought for the safety of you and others, I should inquire. I asked you why you would think that. You said because you had a line over and it did not spiral. I told you then, Every line over has a different configuration. I hope you believe that.
I really do hope you understand the reality of what I was telling you there.
In Dwains post that you quoted, I agree with much of what he is saying, but not everything.
For example: I agree that this part describes an excellent technique if you are using the risers.
In reply to:
180 offheading - flying at wall - very close to impact. No time to turn away. Hard input on both rear risers. Canopy stalls backwards. Let up on left rear riser (while still pulling down on right). Canopy barely turns - cells are barely pressurized and there are waves going through the canopy. Reach across with left hand and pull down on front right riser (while still pulling down on right rear riser). This forces air into the cells - canopy instantly response and spins on the spot. Immediately let up on riser input and release brakes to drive away from the wall.
What I would do in a similar situation is this:
I would go for my toggles and pull them all the way down immediately. This will stop the canopy. From there I can do a snap turn by letting one of the toggles all the way up or I can fly backwards first if I feel I need to and do the snap turn at any time I choose. You can stop and fly backwards just as effectively with the toggles as you can with the risers. By using the toggles you can snap turn on a dime better than you can with risers (this is a main reason I am a toggle guy), plus you dont have to change grips like you would during the riser maneuver. Using the risers will cause you to sink drastically. On the other hand, using the toggles will result in minimal altitude loss (this is another main reason I am a toggle guy).
I also agree with this statement of his:
In reply to:
SLOWER forward speed is BETTER in 99% of serious offheadings close to the wall. Anyone who tells you otherwise has not had to deal with a bona fida 180, half line twists on a go-n-throw from a vertical wall.
I have been in a similar to worse situation.
I used the toggles to save myself. If I had used the risers, I would have had an object strike.
In reply to:
Some people say "toggles". Well toggles are great (and my personal preference) if you aren't really close to the wall and flying directly at it.
I prefer to have my toggles in all situations (except when I have to reach above line-twist).
In reply to:
There are situations (eg. go-n-throw from vertical wall, bona fida 180 with half a line twist) where you do not have time to use toggles (I am NOT talking about the extra time to grab the toggles, I am talking about the response lag between releasing the brakes, pulling down on the toggle and the canopy actually responding).
I disagree with this statement of Dwains. By using practiced technique, I can make the canopy respond considerably faster (time and distance) by using the toggles.
In reply to:
Also you may be so close to the wall that as you are turning away the end cell will drag on the wall and swing you back in.
If you are about to smack a wall nose on, the only thing to do is to back the canopy away far enough so that when you turn it, the end cell won't clip the wall. Flying the canopy backwards is the only option here (unless you are so low that you will pound into a ledge or the ground as you turn - in that case you just have to sink the canopy straight down and PLF - good luck).
I agree, but I want to mention again that you can back out of such a situation by using the toggles like I described above.
Also, (a quote from my article):
>>Keep in mind, when you are flying backwards, you are in a complete stall. That is why I think flying backwards to get out of a tight spot on a low object is a risky endeavor. If it came down to having to ride the ball to the ground, I would MUCH rather do that on toggles.<<
In reply to:
When to go for toggles and when to go for risers?
Basically here is my personal rule for that: If I open and I am flying at a wall and my body starts tensing up for immanent impact then I go for risers, otherwise I tend to go for toggles.
“Oh sh*t, whimper" on opening = risers.
"Uh Oh, I'm looking at wall" = toggles.
If you are super fast on the toggles, through muscle memory you will have your hands going in the toggles as you are realizing your situation. There is no deciding what should I go for, you are already there (or nearly there).
That way when you need to take action, it can be instant.
If you noticed, Dwain mentions a couple things to the effect that a less than ideal brake setting -or- an ideal brake setting, can cause inadequate results while using the risers. If you are using the toggles, then once you pull the steering lines down past the brake setting point, the brake setting that was, is no longer an issue.
In reply to:
Yeah - they(conservative brake settings) work great for rear riser input on a 135 offheading, but turn it into a 160-180 offheading and the wall comes at you like a freight train.
In dealing with point #2 you have installed customized brake settings on your canopy (but not so deep that you risk a stall). Now because the canopy is going so slow you suddenly have response issues to rear riser input. Basically the thing won't want to turn and will probably stall if you pull down too hard on a rear riser.
In this context, if you would like to read my thoughts on the subject of risers or toggles, it is
here.
Hope this helps.