Re: [TomAiello] Newbie Taking a AFF student BASE jumping!
First off, I must say when I hear someone say, “they didn’t know any better, but they do now” and they started BASE jumping within the last fifteen years, it sounds hollow to me. BASE ethics, as an issue, is older than that. The first BASE ethics articles, i.e., how to protect sites, how, and who, should teach, started appearing in the mid-to-late 1980s.
However, there's a bigger issue lurking here . . .
With a perspective that comes from simply being born sooner (not saying a better perspective, just a different one) I see these wars have been raging since almost the beginning of the sport. I say, almost the beginning, because the only “pure” era of BASE is the beginning years when no one knew anything and the playing field was level. This is a time when if you discovered some great truth about BASE jumping, you only had to make three phone calls, and by the next day, the whole BASE community would know it too.
Then it started to change, and, it began to get ugly. I remember (numerous times) X severely berating some hapless newbie for turning others on to BASE in a time when X had just fifty BASE jumps (and more than anyone else at the time) while the newbie had just ten. X is the first person I ever hear refer to an object as, “locals only.”
I knew, right then, we had a problem that would never go away unless we threw the baby out with bath water. Now when protecting legal sites is an issue (a thing we never needed to worry about back then) it’s going to get worse. The baby, in the above, is the freedom.
The balancing act nowadays is letting the newbie experience that freedom, that feeling that fired our imaginations, that thing at the very core of the sport itself, without putting in place all the rules and regulations that drove us out of skydiving and away from the drop zone in the first place. And come on, the transition from yahoo skydiver to cool BASE jumper is as old as the sport itself. We all went through that transition (except for Ritchie, who did it the other way) and we all made some of the mistakes we’re getting on this guy in the thread for.
You can all make up your minds on an individual basis, because that’s part of it too. But, be really really careful. If your major concern is protecting your local site (legal, or not) I’m not entirely sure you have it right. Look at it this way. All one needs to BASE jump is the desire, a rig, and an object. Those three things will always be available. No, local, state, or federal agency can ever shut down BASE jumping. No one person could do it either. If you say it’s for the good of the sport, it doesn’t wash. You are really saying it’s about your convenience. No one can own, rent or parcel out BASE jumping. And that, right there, is the beauty of it, it’s the freedom. We are starting to monkey with that to the point, that well, you know . . .
Nick
BASE 194