Re: [BASE813] PC throw and go techniques
> To be honest I find your tone unpleasant alot of the time...
I would like to share my little thought about the matter. And what I am saying next is generally applicable to any low timer, in which category falls in this case our friend leroydb. And, please, I mean no offense to leroydb nor to any other low timer.
BASE is quite a new sport, yes. But, besides being relatively a NEW sport, there are indeed techniques that are used in 95% of BASE jumps and that are quite well consolidated, being the result of "best practice", developed in about 20 years (at least).
Any single small, and perhaps stupid thing/equipment/technique/whatever used in the above 95% of BASE jumps is the result of years and years of practise, often paid with tears, sometimes the result of successive trials and attempts.
At the same time I can understand that a BASE low timer, thinking about himself being quite smart, looking at the above thing/equipment/technique/whatever, comes out with: What can't we do this? Why can't we do that?
NO CHANCE!!!!!!!! NO WAY!!!!!!
In 95% of BASE jumps (among which sort of jumps fall, I hope, the jumps made by a low timer) there is NO reason to deviate from "best practice".
If something is not in use, it DOES NOT mean that no other smart @ss in our sport has NEVER thought/experimented with it.
Rather, I would tend to think that some really (and true) smart @ss in our sport (as Adam, Todd, Anne, Robert, Mark H, ...) has ALREADY thought and played and tried about it, but he discarded the idea for some negative (=negative in BASE means deadly) side effect.
Which negative side effect of the "new thing" could be no so evident the young new wonder of the sport, so popping out with new brilliant ideas.
My little 0.02€: there is no such a brilliant idea to be introduced in BASE that is thought by a low timer after 5 minutes of reasoning about the matter.
Sorry, I do not want to be offensive, but I try to be realistic.
Q: So in BASE cannot be introduced new things/techniques?
A: Yes, they can, but not from a low timer after 5 minutes of thinking. Unless this low timer is a genius. I know very, very few geniuses.
The magic new wonder of the sport (no offence, really, just to make things clearer) should give a thought about his "new fantastic idea", calm down for few seconds and thinking that, possibly, if nobody has come to this conclusion after 20 years of story (and practice) of BASE, the reason is that there are some negative side issued that are not always so evident.
It takes a bright mind (not necessarily belonging to an old timer) to come out with something new that has positive effects.
It takes a bright mind and a lot of experience (that nearly an old timer can have) to pick up the negative and dangerous sides of the new idea.
To end up this post of mine: if the new wonder comes out with an idea and gets a little bit of flaming, it is NOT because because we do not like him, but perhaps because we (old and new timers) are not so stupid or lazy to have never thought about it.
If it's not been done yet, there must be some really good (=dangerous side effect) reasons behind.
Just my 0.02€.